Page 289 - The Social Weapon: Darwinism

287

the evolutionary spectrum, then we must either affirm that our
morality applies to all living things or deny that our morality has

any foundation at all. Generally Darwinists provide a kind of in-
coherent stew of both. They treat some animals as if they had the
same moral status as human beings, and treat human beings, in
some respects, as if they were just one more animal. On the one
hand, they will argue for animal rights; on the other, they assert
that deformed or old and infirm human beings should be "put
down" out of the same compassion we show for our pets. 171
As we've seen, one main reason why evolutionists seek to
portray man as a species of animal is their desire to eradicate all
moral values. If man were an animal, as Darwinism would have

us believe, then even the concept of morality would be of no im-
portance to people. The damage this would inflict on society is
beyond all imagining. For that reason, all humanity must be on

Richard Dawkins and his The Blind Watchmaker

Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar