Page 349 - The Social Weapon: Darwinism
P. 349

347


                end that acquired traits were passed on to subsequent genera-
                tions. Thus, natural selection fell out of favor as an evolutionary

                mechanism.


                     Neo-Darwinism and Mutations
                     N  e o - D a r w i n i s m   a n d   M u t a t i o n s
                     In order to find a solution, Darwinists advanced the
                "Modern Synthetic Theory," or as it is more commonly known,
                Neo-Darwinism, at the end of the 1930s. Neo-Darwinism added
                mutations, which are distortions formed in the genes of living
                beings due to such external factors as radiation or replication er-
                rors, as the "cause of favorable variations" in addition to natural
                mutation.
                     Today, the model that stands for evolution in the world is
                Neo-Darwinism. The theory maintains that millions of living
                beings formed as a result of a process whereby numerous com-
                plex organs of these organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs, and
                wings) underwent "mutations," that is, genetic disorders. Yet,

                there is an outright scientific fact that totally undermines this
                theory: Mutations do not cause living beings to develop; on the
                contrary, they are always harmful.
                     The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex
                structure, and random effects can only harm it. The American
                geneticist B. G. Ranganathan explains this as follows:
                     First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most
                     mutations are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly
                     changes in the structure of genes; any random change in a highly
                     ordered system will be for the worse, not for the better. For exam-
                     ple, if an earthquake were to shake a highly ordered structure
                     such as a building, there would be a random change in the frame-
                     work of the building which, in all probability, would not be an
                     improvement. 201

                     Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful,


                                 Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar
   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354