Page 514 - Learning from the Qur'an
P. 514

the laws of nature, without any design, plan or arrangement. According to
            the theory, inanimate matter must have produced a living cell as a result of
            coincidences. Such a claim, however, is inconsistent with the most unassailable
            rules of biology.
              "Life Comes from Life"
              In his book, Darwin never referred to the origin of life. The primitive
            understanding of science in his time rested on the assumption that living
            beings had a very simple structure. Since medieval times, spontaneous
            generation, which asserts that non-living materials came together to form
            living organisms, had been widely accepted. It was commonly believed that
            insects came into being from food leftovers, and mice from wheat. Interesting
            experiments were conducted to prove this theory. Some wheat was placed on
            a dirty piece of cloth, and it was believed that mice would originate from it after
            a while.
              Similarly, maggots developing in rotting meat was assumed to be evidence
            of spontaneous generation. However, it was later understood that worms did
            not appear on meat spontaneously, but were carried there by flies in the form
            of larvae, invisible to the naked eye.
              Even when Darwin wrote The Origin of Species, the belief that bacteria
            could come into existence from non-living matter was widely accepted in the
            world of science.
              However, five years after the publication of Darwin's book, Louis Pasteur
            announced his results after long studies and experiments, that disproved
            spontaneous generation, a cornerstone of Darwin's theory. In his triumphal
            lecture at the Sorbonne in 1864, Pasteur said: "Never will the doctrine of
            spontaneous generation recover from the mortal blow struck by this simple
            experiment."  18
              For a long time, advocates of the theory of evolution resisted these findings.
            However, as the development of science unraveled the complex structure of
            the cell of a living being, the idea that life could come into being coincidentally
            faced an even greater impasse.

              Inconclusive Efforts in the Twentieth Century
              The first evolutionist who took up the subject of the origin of life in the
            twentieth century was the renowned Russian biologist Alexander Oparin.
            With various theses he advanced in the 1930s, he tried to prove that a living
            cell could originate by coincidence. These studies, however, were doomed to
            failure, and Oparin had to make the following confession:


                                    ~ 539 ~
   509   510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519