Page 194 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 194

192  "Selfish Gene" Theory, The



               ture, un der mines the fun da men tal  spring sur vive, there will be a great -
               prem ise of the the o ry of ev o lu tion.   er chance of her genes be ing hand ed
                  Indeed, the well-known ev o lu -  on to the sub se quent gen er a tions.
               tion ist Stephen Jay Gould de scribes  According to this per spec tive, all
               "the vex a tious prob lem of al tru ism"  liv ing things, hu man be ings in clud -
               214  in  na ture.  The  ev o lu tion ist  ed, are gene ma chines. And ev ery
               Gordon Rattray Taylor writes that   liv ing thing's most im por tant task is
               the  al tru is tic  be hav ior  in  liv ing  to be able to hand on its genes to lat -
               things "has long pre sent ed a chal -  er gen er a tions.
               lenge for Darwinism,"  215  mak ing  it  Evolutionists say that liv ing
               clear what a di lem ma ev o lu tion ists  things are pro grammed to con tin ue
               face in the ar ea. Nature con tains in -  their own blood lines and to wish to
               stan ces  of  al tru ism  and  af fec tion,  pass on their genes, and so be have in
               which are com plete ly non-ma te ri al  a  man ner  ap pro pri ate  to  that  pro -
               val ues, which deals a mor tal blow to  gram ming. The fol low ing quote is
               the ma te ri al ist view that sees all of  an ex am ple of the clas sic ev o lu tion -
               na ture  as  ran dom  in ter ac tions  of  ist ac count of an i mal be hav ior:
               mat ter.                              What could ac count for po ten tial ly
                  However, un will ing to ad mit the  self-de struc tive  be hav ior?  At  least
               in va lid i ty of ev o lu tion a ry sce nar i os,  some al tru is tic acts are re put ed to stem
               some ev o lu tion ists came up with the  from so-called self ish genes. Parents
               so-called Selfish Gene Theory.        that work them selves rag ged to feed in -
               According to this claim, whose lead -  sa tia ble off spring or go with out food as
                                                     long as a pred a tor is near are prob a bly
               ing   proponent    was    Richard
                                                     car ry ing out ge net i cal ly pro grammed
               Dawkins, one of the most av id pre-
                                                     be hav ior—be hav ior that in creas es the
               sent-day  pro po nents  of  ev o lu tion,
                                                     chan ces of pa ren tal genes with in the
               be hav ior that ap pears to be al tru is tic
                                                     off spring be ing passed on to yet an oth -
               ac tu al ly stems from self ish ness, in
                                                     er gen er a tion. These in nate, in stinc tive
               ex hib it ing  al tru is tic  be hav ior,  an i -
                                                     re spons es to pred a tors may seem "pur -
               mals are ac tu al ly think ing of pre -
                                                     pose ful" to the hu man ob serv er, but in
               serv ing their genes rath er than of  fact they are be hav ior al pro grams trig -
               help ing an oth er liv ing thing. In sac -  gered by sights, sounds, odors, and
               ri fic ing her own life for that of her  oth er cues.  216
               off spring, a moth er is ac tu al ly pro -
                                                     Consequently, ev o lu tion ists say
               tect ing her own genes. If her off -

                                                               The Evolution Impasse II
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199