Page 211 - The Evolution Impasse 2
P. 211

Taxonomy   209



           Zuckerman and his team read:          The pro tru sions over the eye -
              For my own part, the an a tom i cal ba sis  brows, the most im por tant fea ture
              for the claim that the Australopithecines  that led to Australopithecus af ri ca nus
              walk ed and ran up right like man is so  be ing de scribed as a hom i nid, can be
              much more flim sy than the ev i dence  seen in young go ril las to day. From
              which points to the con clu sion that their  all this, it ap pears that the skull as -
              gait was some var i ant of what one sees  cribed to  Australopithecus  af ri ca nus
              in sub hu man Primates, that it re mains
                                               by ev o lu tion ists did not be long to an
              un ac cept a ble.  238
                                               an ces tor of man but in all prob a bil i -
              These judg ments, pub lished by  ty, to a young ape.
           Zuckerman in the mid-1950s, were
           con firmed by sub se quent re search -
           ers. Dean Falk, a spe cial ist in neu ro - TAXONOMY
           a nat o my,  de clared  that  the  Taung
                                                 Biologists di vide liv ing things in -
           skull be longed to a young mon key.
                                               to spe cif ic class es. This clas si fi ca tion,
           "In his 1975 ar ti cle, Dart had claimed
                                               known as  tax on o my, dates back to
           that the brain of Taung was hu man -
                                               Carolus Linnaeus in the 18th cen tu -
           like. As it turned out, he was wrong
                                               ry.  The  clas si fi ca tion  sys tem  that
           about that. . . . Taung's hu man like
                                               Linnaeus con struct ed has been ex -
           fea tures  were  over em pha sized,"
                                               pand ed and re vised, but is still in
           claimed Falk, who went on to say:
                                               use to day.
              Like hu mans, [apes and mon keys] go  This sys tem of clas si fi ca tion con -
              through sta ges as they grow up. In his  tains hi er arch i cal cat e go ries. Living
              anal y sis of Taung, Dart did not ful ly
                                               things are first di vid ed in to king -
              ap pre ci ate that in fant apes have not
                                               doms, such as the an i mal and plant
              had time to de vel op fea tures of the
                                               king doms. Kingdoms are then sub -
              skull, such as thick ened eye brow ridges
                                               di vid ed in to phy la, which are then
              or at tach ment ar e as for heavy neck
                                               fur ther  sub di vid ed.  Classification
              mus cles, that set adult apes apart from
                                               takes the fol low ing form, in de -
              hu man. Apparently he did not care ful -
                                               scend ing or der:
              ly con sid er the pos si bil i ty that Taung's
              round ed fore head or the in ferred po si -  king dom
              tion of the spi nal cord might be due to  phy lum (plu ral phy la)
              the im ma tur i ty of the ape like spec i men  class
              rath er than to its re sem blance to hu -  or der
              mans.  239                         fam i ly

           Harun Yahya - Adnan Oktar
   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216