Page 131 - The Dark Clan

129

Giulio Romano,
Rome, 1519

When Yusuf rejected advances of the governor's wife, she tore
the back of his shirt. This shirt, torn from behind was an impor-
tant proof of the wife's guilt.

the evidence proved the innocence of the person accused, the
system imprisoned him as if guilty simply because those who
had made the allegations had status in that society and had
made a fuss. This shows us that we must examine real evi-
dence without being influenced by the propaganda and the

fuss created by the clan when determining the truth about the
guilt or innocence of the person targeted by it.
As clearly seen in the verses about Yusuf, if the Clan's in-
terests are at risk it can activate shadowy schemes, fabricate
evidence and destroy innocent people by slanderous meth-
ods. As seen in the narrative of Yusuf, it is an important tacti-
cal move to present a blameless front whilst being the

aggressor. To achieve the desired effect they can shed croco-
dile tears, make a scene as if they were the victims or make in-
sinuations in order to mislead the public. Their shameless