Page 110 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propagand‪a
P. 110

A DEFINITIVE REPLY
                                       TO EVOLUTIONIST
                                         PROPAGANDA


               thread to another suitable point. After having drawn a few diagonal
               struts in this way, it starts to fill in the gaps between them with cir-
               cular links. Anything coming into contact with the web is swiftly
               immobilised. Yet, the spider itself is unaffected by the adhesive na-
               ture of its web.
                   In other words, for the spider to have come about by evolution,
               both the web with its exceedingly complex biochemical structure,
               and the complex behavior allowing the spider to make use of the
               web, would have to have come about by means of chance muta-
               tions. It is clear that this is impossible. Moreover, there is absolutely
               no experimental, observational, or fossil evidence to support this
               evolutionist claim.
                   On the contrary, the evidence deals a mortal blow to evolution:
               the fact that 380-million-year-old spider fossils are no different from
               modern spiders, and the complex structure of the web, pose insu-
               perable difficulties for evolutionists. Given these difficulties, The
               Discovery Channel declines to touch on the subject of how an organ
               that produces a substance with such superior properties, which sci-
               entists are trying to imitate, could have evolved by chance muta-
               tions. It therefore resorts to familiar old stories. The channel starts
               off with the shape of the nest, which spiders erected between plants
               on the ground and which contained a downward-pointing funnel:
               "These nests in the shape of funnels turned into a silken layer as the
               spiders climbed up on the trees. The gradually developing layer
               turned sideways, took shape and the circular web formed."
                   The Discovery Channel may imagine that with this story it has
               overcome the problem of the origin of spiders. If so, it is mistaken,
               because the web it places at the beginning of its story must have
               been made of spider thread with a flawless structure. Since it offers
               no proof that webs close to the ground are ancient in evolutionary
               terms, whereas those high up are more recent, it places spider webs
               in an imaginary chronological framework.








                                             108
   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115