Page 17 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propagand‪a

HARUN YAHYA

Space is devoted to the comments of a veterinarian regard-
ing a monkey which was brought to him for treatment. The
veterinarian states that some of the medicines he used for the
monkey were actually human medicines, and cites this as
evidence that the two species are related.
The fact, however, that medicines
can prove to be effective
in both species
provides no
evidence

for the the-
ory of evolu-
tion whatsoever.
The comparison is
merely one made in line with
Darwinist prejudices. It is quite natural that
similar chemicals should benefit both man and
apes. Both species share the same biosphere and the
same carbon-based organic molecules. This common
structure applies not just to man and apes, but to the whole of
nature. For instance, human beings produce medicine from the
blood of the horseshoe crab. Yet this does not mean that man and
the horseshoe crab are related. On the other hand, kidney trans-
plants carried out from chimpanzees to human beings represent a
serious blow to the claims of similar physiology. Dr. Keith
Reemtsma of Tulane University carried out more than a dozen such
transplants from chimpanzees to human beings in 1963, but all the

15