Page 198 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propagand‪a

Cars, for instance, which emerge as the prod-
uct of a conscious design and the collabora-
tion of engineers, are exceedingly functional.
If the evolutionist claim is to be accepted,
however, then it needs to be accepted that a
perfect car could emerge by chance, on its
own, with all its technical accessories. That is
a most illogical claim. That being the case, it
must be understood that it is far more irra-
tional still to maintain that living things,
which possess a far more complex and flaw-
less design than that in the car, could be the
product of chance.

rials in nature to give rise to birds, fish, horses, flowers, and human
beings of all races, it is clear that they need the existence of a supe-
rior Creator, possessed of infinite knowledge, wisdom, and power,
as well as a flawless design capability. That creator is God, the Lord
of all, Who created all the worlds from nothing.

There is no Mechanism in Nature Which
Could Turn the Ape Brain into a Human One

A classical evolutionist claim was repeated on the BBC docu-
mentary, in which it was suggested that the brains of our ape-like
ancestors turned into the human brain over a period of some 2.5
million years. An analogy was drawn: The brain capacity of our
ape-like ancestors was compared to a small Fiat car engine, and that

196