Page 216 - A Definitive Reply to Evolutionist Propaganda
P. 216
A DEFINITIVE REPLY
TO EVOLUTIONIST
PROPAGANDA
each other.
Yet, it is an evident truth that the design in the eye was intelli-
gently created. The program attempts to cover up the fact that the
origin of the eye is one of the greatest dilemmas facing Darwinism,
and basically glosses over the matter by saying that the arthropods
developed eyes with precise and complex structures to enable them
to perceive images.
If somebody one day told you "Computers made fast CPUs for
themselves in order to function better," you would think that claim
was a very odd and nonsensical one. Computers cannot develop
their own systems; only computer engineers can do that. The same
thing applies to living things. Living things cannot provide them-
selves with brand new features. That is only possible by intelligent
design. The only reason why this intelligent design is being ignored
is the Darwinist theory and materialist philosophy to which those
who ignore the concept of intelligent design are so blindly devoted
(as well as the atheism that underpins both).
The method employed to cover up such matters with regard to
the eye and antennae emerges when it comes to extensions such as
pincers, with their own particular design. The documentary pro-
poses that with a small evolutionary leap, legs can turn into pincers
capable of gripping. This is a truly ridiculous claim. The designs in
the leg and pincer are encoded in the creature's DNA. Different
DNA sequences are needed for the leg and pincer. Furthermore,
both sequences are based on information. It is impossible for this al-
leged change to have come about by mutations, which evolutionists
try to portray as the basis of evolution. Mutations cause damaging
effects in an organism, or at best have no effect at all. It is not possi-
ble for a random mutation to add to DNA the necessary information
for a leg and so regulate the system. Indeed, such a change has
never been observed.
In fact, the documentary is filled with such evolutionist fairy
tales from beginning to end. This statement is particularly striking
from the point of view of revealing the deceptive style that domi-
214
