Page 212 - The Origin of Birds and Flight
P. 212

210                  The Origin of Birds and Flight

                     persisted unchanged in essential characters for millions of years? Or
                     are actual ancestors far more basal in morphology and harder to classi-
                     fy? If the latter, then why insist that the problem is now solved? 174
                     Alan Feduccia sets out an important fact concerning the dino-birds
                said to have been found in China: the “feathers” on the fossils said to be
                those of feathered dinosaurs are definitely not bird feathers. A consider-
                able body of evidence shows that these fossil traces have nothing at all
                to do with bird feathers. He says this in an article published in The Auk
                magazine:
                     Having studied most of the specimens said to sport protofeathers, I,
                     and many others, do not find any credible evidence that those struc-
                     tures represent protofeathers. Many Chinese fossils have that strange
                     halo of what has become known as dino-fuzz, but although that mate-
                     rial has been “homologized” with avian feathers, the arguments are far
                     less than convincing. 175
                     Citing Richard O. Prum, one of the supporters of the dino-bird
                claims, as an example, Feduccia goes on to mention the prejudiced
                approach so prevalent on the subject:
                     Prum’s view is shared by many paleontologists: birds are dinosaurs;
                     therefore, any filamentous material preserved in  dromaeosaurs must
                     represent protofeathers. 176
                     According to Feduccia, one factor that invalidates this preconcep-
                tion is the presence of these same traces in fossils that have no relation-
                ship with birds:
                     Most important, “dino-fuzz” is now being discovered in a number of
                     taxa, some unpublished, but particularly in a Chinese pterosaur and a
                     therizinosaur, which has teeth like those of prosauropods. Most surpris-
                     ingly, skin fibers very closely resembling dino-fuzz have been discov-
                     ered in a Jurassic ichthyosaur and described in detail. Some of those
                     branched fibers are exceptionally close in morphology to the so-called
                     branched protofeathers (“Prum Protofeathers”") described by Xu. That
                     these so-called protofeathers have a widespread distribution in
   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217