Page 252 - The Errors the American National Academy of Sciences
P. 252

The Errors of the American National Academy of Sciences



              is to say, the evidence (the car) would lead you to understand that you
              were not the first rational being to visit the island.
                   Regarding the question of how design can be identified in bio-
              logical structures, the scientific criteria put forward by the mathe-

              matician William Dembski may serve as a guide. In his book The
              Design Inference: Eliminating Chance Through Small Probabilities,
              Dembski mathematically shows at which stage it is impossible for a
              structure to be explained by chance and when the existence of an in-
              telligent design is beyond dispute. Evolutionists are hopeless in the
              face of these criteria of Dembski's.

                   The way out of this dilemma sought by evolutionists is the same
              one we have examined elsewhere: they claim that structures referred
              to as complex could actually evolve by means of natural selection.
              Yet, this is a very easy claim to test. For example, it can be observed in
              a laboratory whether, over thousands of generations, a bacterium

              lacking flagella comes to develop these irreducibly complex struc-
              tures when exposed to mutations. If, as the result of this experiment,
              flagella appear, the claim that chance and natural selection can lead to
              irreducibly complex structures will be meaningful. Even the appear-
              ance of a single new protein in that bacterium would be chalked up as
              a success for evolutionists. Yet, no experiment has ever produced

              such a result. In fact, to conduct such an experiment would be as fu-
              tile as observing a pile of scrap for a million years to see whether a jet
              airplane will emerge.
                   In fact, we are witnessing the collapse of this strange logic, which
              is unable to see the most obvious facts due to a fanatical devotion to

              materialist philosophy. If a person sees a note reading "I SHALL BE
              HOME AT 10" on the table when he enters a room, he will not imag-
              ine that the note was written by chance—say, by the wind blowing
              through the window and knocking over a bottle of ink. He will be




                                              250
   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257