Page 74 - The Errors the American National Academy of Sciences

The Errors of the American National Academy of Sciences

The upshot of this micro/macro evolution debate and evolution-
ists' "speciation" fairytales is this: Living things emerged on the Earth
as "kinds" possessing structures that differed from one another. (The
fossil record demonstrates this.) Within these kinds, variants and sub-
species may appear thanks to the richness of their genetic pools. For in-

stance, the "rabbit" type contains white-haired and grey-haired, and
long-eared and short-eared, variants within itself, and these have
spread according to the prevailing natural conditions. However, kinds
can never turn into each other. There is no natural mechanism that can
design new kinds, or that can form new organs, systems, or body plans
within a type. Each kind was created with its own peculiar structure,
and since God has created them all with a rich variation potential,
every kind produces a rich, but restricted, range of variation.

o
i
s A
ns
on
s
Co
C

on
e
es
nf
ci
ec
pe
a
on
o
at
ou
bo
Ab
ut
Sp
S

'
u
ut
o
E E v v vo l lu t ti i io n i is st t ts ' C o n f fe s ss si io n s A b o u t t S p e c i ia t ti i io n
o
ol
s
s
s'
on
ni

E Evolutionists' Confessions About Speciation

n
Apart from "amateur" evolutionists who have only a superficial
knowledge of the subject and such dogmatic evolutionists as the mem-
bers of the National Academy of
Sciences, almost all Darwinists are
very well aware of the fundamental
problem: to account for the origin of
living kinds and the diversity of life.
As Theodosius Dobzhansky, one of
the architects of neo-Darwinism,
wrote in the introduction to his
Genetics and the Origin of Species, the
main problem facing evolution is the
variety of life. 5
This is the subject that Charles
Darwin and his followers need to il-
Theodosius Dobzhansky
72