Page 237 - America's Failure to Perceive the PKK

Read the KCK Contract.
It is the constitution of a dictatorship.

I was horrified by the articles I read.

It starts off with libertarian statements, but then refers to the
"leadership" as the "only decision-making body."
I do not know what a Kurd who disagreed with the "leadership"
is supposed to do. Such a possibility has clearly never even

crossed the mind of the authors of this constitution.
From what I can tell, in their eyes no Kurd could ever think dif-
ferently to the "leadership" on any issue.

The KCK Executive Council can bring in the Popular Liberation
Court Prosecutor's Office and appoint judges.

The "press committee" engages in "activity aimed at improv-
ing ideological and national unity." Do Kurds really want to
live under such a system?

Is the only way to escape years of oppression by the Turks to live
in a society run by a leadership, councils and committee and in
which a conception of national unity" is officialized?

If our BDP friends think that this KCK "constitution" is real-
ly very modern and beneficial, would they propose the same
items for the new Turkish Constitution?

Should Turkey also have a "leadership," an "executive coun-
cil" and "committees?" Should the council be given the right to
appoint prosecutors and judges?

If they do not desire such things for the Turkish Constitution,
then why do they wish them for the Kurds?

Why is a constitution that the Turks would never accept and
that nobody now could even think of proposing to them, be
imposed on the Kurds by Kurds? 88

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya) 235