Page 401 - America's Failure to Perceive the PKK

T The Tale of Human Evolution

The subject most often brought up by advocates of the theory of
evolution is the subject of the origin of man. The Darwinist claim

holds that man evolved from so-called ape-like creatures. During this
alleged evolutionary process, which is supposed to have started four
to five million years ago, some "transitional forms" between man and
his imaginary ancestors are supposed to have existed. According to
this completely imaginary scenario, four basic "categories" are listed:
1. Australopithecus
2. Homo habilis
3. Homo erectus
4. Homo sapiens
Evolutionists call man's so-called first ape-like ancestors Aus-

tralopithecus, which means "South African ape." These living beings
are actually nothing but an old ape species that has become extinct.
Extensive research done on various Australopithecus specimens by two
world famous anatomists from England and the USA, namely, Lord
Solly Zuckerman and Prof. Charles Oxnard, shows that these apes
belonged to an ordinary ape species that became extinct and bore no
resemblance to humans. (Solly Zuckerman, Beyond The Ivory Tower,

Toplinger Publications, New York, 1970, 75-14; Charles E. Oxnard,
"The Place of Australopithecines in Human Evolution: Grounds for
Doubt", Nature, vol 258, 389)
Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as
"homo," that is "man." According to their claim, the living beings in
the Homo series are more developed than Australopithecus. Evolu-
tionists devise a fanciful evolution scheme by arranging different fos-

sils of these creatures in a particular order. This scheme is imaginary
because it has never been proved that there is an evolutionary relation
between these different classes. Ernst Mayr, one of the twentieth cen-
tury's most important evolutionists, contends in his book One Long
Argument that "particularly historical [puzzles] such as the origin of

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya) 399