Page 96 - The Struggle of the Messengers

94 The Struggle of the Messengers

beings due to such external factors as radiation or replication
errors, as the "cause of favorable variations" in addition to natural
mutation.
Today, the model that Darwinists espouse, despite their own

awareness of its scientific invalidity, is neo-Darwinism. The
theory maintains that millions of living beings formed as a result
of a process whereby numerous complex organs of these
organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs, and wings) underwent
"mutations," that is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is an outright
scientific fact that totally undermines this theory: Mutations do
not cause living beings to develop; on the contrary, they are
always harmful.
The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex
structure, and random effects can only harm it. The American

geneticist B. G. Ranganathan explains this as follows:
First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most
mutations are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly
changes in the structure of genes; any random change in a highly
ordered system will be for the worse, not for the better. For
example, if an earthquake were to shake a highly ordered

structure such as a building, there would be a random
change in the framework of the building which, in all
probability, would not be an improvement. 9
Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful, that is,
which is observed to develop the genetic code, has been observed
so far. All mutations have proved to be harmful. It was
understood that mutation, which is presented as an "evolutionary
mechanism," is actually a genetic occurrence that harms living

things, and leaves them disabled. (The most common effect of