Page 249 - Matter: The Other Name for Illusion

Crippled babies who were born in the aftermath of the Chernobyl disaster. This picture
reveals that mutations, which evolutionists claim have an effect on the origins of living
things, actually have disastrous effects on human beings.

The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex structure, and
random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G. Ranganathan
explains this as follows:
First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations
are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly changes in the

structure of genes; any random change in a highly ordered system will be
for the worse, not for the better. For example, if an earthquake were to
shake a highly ordered structure such as a building, there would be a
random change in the framework of the building which, in all probability,
would not be an improvement. 61
Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful, that is, which is
observed to develop the genetic code, has been observed so far. All mutations
have proved to be harmful. It was understood that mutation, which is

presented as an "evolutionary mechanism," is actually a genetic occurrence
that harms living things, and leaves them disabled. (The most common effect
of mutation on human beings is cancer.) Of course, a destructive mechanism
cannot be an "evolutionary mechanism." Natural selection, on the other hand,
"can do nothing by itself," as Darwin also accepted. This fact shows us that
there is no "evolutionary mechanism" in nature. Since no evolutionary
mechanism exists, no such any imaginary process called "evolution" could
have taken place.

The Misconception of Evolution 247