Page 112 - Communism in Ambush

COMMUNISM IN AMBUSH
110

agation. Marriage is not entered into for the sake of morality; its purpose
is the continuation of the species. Families do not look after their chil-
dren; the state or those appointed by it perform this function. A child is
seen as a new addition to the herd and is trained to fight for it and pro-
tect it. Because the mother hates her home and environment, she passes
her harshness on to her offspring. Children growing up deprived of
family love become pessimistic and aggressive. In the place of love and
respect in the home, hostility reigns. The child has no one to trust.
• In a society with no concept of marriage, fidelity, or chastity but
only a mating mentality, prostitution becomes widespread.
• The police-state oppression controlling Communist society can-
not take the place of conscience and the fear of God. For this reason, the
crime rate soars; thievery is rampant everywhere. People steal from fac-
tories, farms and cooperatives collectively as a matter of course.
• However much Communist ideology may claim otherwise,
racism is widespread in Communist society. In the Soviet Union, for ex-
ample, there was antipathy to anyone who was not Russians, especially
Muslims. Adopting the racist Darwinist theory in every aspect, Russians
regarded various Muslim minorities and other minorities as "ethnic
groups that were not completely evolved" and subjected them to mass
slaughter, under the name of deportation. Communist ideology thinks
of murder as "natural dialectic"—a natural component of evolution.
• Communism sees human beings only as productive animals. It
reserves a special hatred and loathing for villagers. Marx called villagers
inferior "potato sacks." As we saw earlier, Lenin and Stalin murdered
millions by deliberately letting them starve. To them, villagers were only
herds of animals that produced grain and cotton. Confiscating what
they produced (collectivization) was seen as legitimate and reasonable
as collecting the honey from the beehives.
These generalizations are only a broad sketch of a society without
religion. In nations where disbelief prevails, no matter what they call
themselves, this way of life must unavoidably prevail. People are not re-
spected as worthy beings whom God created and endowed with spirit.
With people regarding one another as advanced animals that will perish
with death, a society cannot experience well-being, peace, security, co-