Page 230 - For Men of Understanding
P. 230

Neo-Darwinism and Mutations

                           In order to find a solution, Darwinists advanced the "Modern Synthetic
                        Theory," or as it is more commonly known, Neo-Darwinism, at the end of the
                        1930s. Neo-Darwinism added mutations, which are distortions formed in the
                        genes of living beings due to such external factors as radiation or replication
                        errors, as the "cause of favorable variations" in addition to natural mutation.
                           Today, the model that stands for evolution in the world is Neo-Darwinism.
                        The theory maintains that millions of living beings formed as a result of a process
                        whereby numerous complex organs of these organisms (e.g., ears, eyes, lungs,
                        and wings) underwent "mutations," that is, genetic disorders. Yet, there is an out-
                        right scientific fact that totally undermines this theory: Mutations do not cause liv-
                        ing beings to develop; on the contrary, they are always harmful.
                           The reason for this is very simple: DNA has a very complex structure, and
                        random effects can only harm it. The American geneticist B. G. Ranganathan
                        explains this as follows:
                           First, genuine mutations are very rare in nature. Secondly, most mutations
                           are harmful since they are random, rather than orderly changes in the struc-
                           ture of genes; any random change in a highly ordered system will be for
                           the worse, not for the better. For example, if an earthquake were to shake
                           a highly ordered structure such as a building, there would be a random
                           change in the framework of the building which, in all probability, would
                           not be an improvement. 9
                           Not surprisingly, no mutation example, which is useful, that is, which is
                        observed to develop the genetic code, has been observed so far. All mutations
                        have proved to be harmful. It was understood that mutation, which is present-
                                                        ed as an "evolutionary mechanism," is actual-
                                                        ly a genetic occurrence that harms living
                                                        things, and leaves them disabled. (The most
                                                        common effect of mutation on human beings
                                                        is cancer.) Of course, a destructive mecha-
                                                        nism cannot be an "evolutionary mecha-
                                                        nism." Natural selection, on the other hand,
                                                        "can do nothing by itself," as Darwin also
                                                        accepted. This fact shows us that there is no
                                                        "evolutionary mechanism" in nature. Since no
                        Random mutations are always harmful  evolutionary mechanism exists, no such any
                        to living things. The picture shows a calf
                                                        imaginary process called "evolution" could
                        born with two heads as the result of
                        embryonic exposure to radiation or  have taken place.
                        chemicals.



        228  For Men of Understanding
   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235