Page 266 - For Men of Understanding
P. 266

ed to a second person's brain, that person would also feel full after Engels fin-
                        ished the cake. If the nerves of materialist Johnson, who felt pain in his foot
                        after delivering a sound kick to a stone, were connected to a second individ-
                        ual, that person too would feel himself kick the same stone and feel the same
                        pain.
                           So, which cake or stone is the real one? Again, materialist philosophy falls
                        short of giving a consistent answer. The correct, consistent answer is that
                        Engels and the second person have both eaten the cake and are satiated in their
                        minds; both Johnson and the second person have fully experienced kicking the
                        stone-again, in their minds.
                           In our previous example, let's make an exchange: Connecting the nerves of
                        the man hit by the bus to Politzer's brain, and the nerves of Politzer, sitting in
                        his house, to brain of that accident victim. In this case, Politzer will think that
                        a bus has hit him, but the man actually hit by the bus will never feel the impact
                        and think that he is sitting in Politzer's house. The very same logic can be
                        applied to the examples involving the cake and the stone.
                           All this reveals how dogmatic materialism actually is. Its philosophy is
                        founded on the assumption that nothing exists except matter. The fact is, how-
                        ever, that no one can ever experience any direct contact with matter and thus
                        be justified in claiming that everything consists of it. The universe we contact
                        is the universe that we perceive in our minds. The famous British philosopher
                        David Hume expressed his thoughts on this point:
                           For my part, when I enter most intimately into what I call myself, I always
                           stumble on some particular perception or other, of heat or cold, light or
                           shade, love or hatred, pain or pleasure. I never can catch myself at any time
                           without a perception, and never can observe any thing but the percep-
                           tion. 12
                           We can never step outside these perceptions and encounter matter as it
                        "really" is, so it is wholly nonsensical to construct any philosophy regarding
                        matter as an absolute entity we can experience directly. As a theory, material-
                        ism is totally unfounded, right from the outset.


                           The Formation of Perceptions in the Brain Is Not Philosophy,
                           But Scientific Fact

                           Materialists claim that what we have stated here is a philosophical view. But
                        the plain scientific fact is, we cannot interact with the "external" material world,
                        but only with a world in our brain. This is not a matter of philosophy. All med-
                        ical schools teach in detail how images and feelings form in the brain. Facts
                        proven by twentieth-century science, and by physics in particular, clearly show


        264  For Men of Understanding
   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271