Page 578 - Atlas of Creation Volume 1

BLOW FROM FOSSIL SKULLS TO DARWINISM

arwin’s thesis, suggesting that men and apes evolved from a common ancestor, could not be
supported by scientific findings, neither during the period it was first proposed, nor in the
D years since the middle of the 19th century—that is, for approximately 150 years, all efforts
put forth to support the fable of man’s evolution have proved void.
All fossils collected have proven that apes were always apes and men were always men; that apes

did not transform into men, and that apes and men shared no common ancestor.
Despite Darwinists’ intense propaganda and attempts of intimidation in academic circles, many
scientists have found the courage to express this truth. One of them is David Pilbeam, a paleontologist
of Harvard University, who states that the so-called evolution of man is a suggestion devoid of any sci-
entific data:

If you brought in a smart scientist from another discipline and showed him the meager evidence we’ve got
he’d surely say, “Forget it; there isn’t enough to go on.” 1

William Fix, author of The Bone Peddlers, a book on paleontology, expresses how the so-called “evo-
lution” of man is not supported by scientific evidence:

As we have seen, there are numerous scientists and popularizers today
who have the temerity to tell us that there is “no doubt” how man
originated. If only they had the evidence. . . . 2

In the face of the disap-
pointment caused by the
imaginary arrange the fake skulls
imaginary
fossil record and the lack
of any evidence, evolu-
tionists could only re-

several times and make
speculations about skulls
which have been documented to
be counterfeits. However, research-
es made on the skulls of apes, as well
as other living beings and different
human races that lived in the past, re-

vealed that these living beings have
had existed with all the features they
had and have not changed throughout
history.

Each and every evolutionist examining
the fossils may come up with a different
scenario based on his own imagination,
which in fact has no scientific value.

576 Atlas of Creation