Page 93 - Justice and Compassion in the Qur'an

91
HARUN YAHYA (ADNAN OKTAR)

this subject for years and studied Australopithecus fossils for
15 years, finally concluded, despite being an evolutionist
himself, that there is, in fact, no such family tree branching
out from ape-like creatures to man.
Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science"
ranging from those he considered scientific to those he
considered unscientific. According to Zuckerman's spectrum,
the most "scientific"—that is, depending on concrete data—
fields of science are chemistry and physics. After them come
the biological sciences and then the social sciences. At the far
end of the spectrum, which is the part considered to be most
"unscientific," are "extra-sensory perception"—concepts such
as telepathy and sixth sense—and finally "human evolution."

Zuckerman explains his reasoning:
We then move right off the register of objective truth into those
fields of presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception
or the interpretation of man's fossil history, where to the faithful
[evolutionist] anything is possible – and where the ardent believer
[in evolution] is sometimes able to believe several contradictory
things at the same time. 69
The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but
the prejudiced interpretations of some fossils unearthed by
certain people, who blindly adhere to their theory.

Darwinian Formula!
Besides all the technical evidence we have dealt with so
far, let us now for once, examine what kind of a superstition
the evolutionists have with an example so simple as to be
understood even by children:
The theory of evolution asserts that life is formed by