Page 81 - The Struggle Against the Religion of Irreligion

If so, it will present a parallel to the theory of evolution itself, a

theory universally accepted, not because it can be proved by

logically coherent evidence to be true, but because the only

alternative, special creation, is clearly incredible. 73

Chandra Wickramasinghe, a famous British scientist, explains

how people are conditioned to denial of Allah:

From my earliest training as a scientist, I was very strongly

brainwashed to believe that science cannot be consistent with

any kind of deliberate creation. That notion has had to be

painfully shed. At the moment, I can't find any rational

argument to knock down the view which argues for conversion to

God. We used to have an open mind; now we realize that the

only logical answer to life is creation and not accidental random

shuffling. 74

The examples above clearly illustrate that evolutionist scientists

must believe in the theory of evolution based on materialism in order

to be able to reject Allah, although they know the theory is false. And

these individuals are but a few of the leading materialist evolutionists

of our day.

72 Richard Lewontin, "Billions and Billions of Demons," review of The Demon-Haunted World:
Science As a Candle in the Dark by Carl Sagan, The New York Review of Books, January 9,
1997, p. 31.
73 D.M.S. Watson, "Adaptation," Nature, Issue 124, p. 233.
74 Chandra Wickramasinghe, interview in London Daily Express, August 14, 1981.

79