Page 218 - Photosynthesis: The Green Miracle
P. 218

Adnan Oktar



                 Evolutionists classify the next stage of human evolution as "homo," that
             is "man." According to their claim, the living beings in the Homo series are
             more developed than Australopithecus. Evolutionists devise a fanciful evolu-
             tion scheme by arranging different fossils of these creatures in a particular
             order. This scheme is imaginary because it has never been proved that there
             is an evolutionary relation between these different classes. Ernst Mayr, one
             of the twentieth century's most important evolutionists, contends in his
             book One Long Argument that "particularly historical [puzzles] such as the
             origin of life or of Homo sapiens, are extremely difficult and may even resist
             a final, satisfying explanation." 103
                 By outlining the link chain as Australopithecus > Homo habilis > Homo
             erectus > Homo sapiens, evolutionists imply that each of these species is one
             another's ancestor. However, recent findings of paleoanthropologists have
             revealed that Australopithecus, Homo habilis, and Homo erectus lived at differ-
             ent parts of the world at the same time. 104
                 Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus have
             lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens neandarthalensis and Homo
             sapiens sapiens (modern man) co-existed in the same region. 105
                 This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim that they
             are ancestors of one another. Stephen Jay Gould explained this deadlock of
             the theory of evolution, although he was himself one of the leading advo-
             cates of evolution in the twentieth century:
                 What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of ho-
                 minids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis), none clear-
                 ly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionary
                 trends during their tenure on earth. 106
                 Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is "upheld" with the
             help of various drawings of some "half ape, half human" creatures appear-
             ing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by means of propaganda,
             is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.
                 Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected scientists
             in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years and studied
             Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded, despite being an evo-




                                              216
   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223