Page 16 - Confessions of the Evolutionists

14 CONFESSIONS OF THE EVOLUTIONISTS

they discover evidence that discredits the theory of evolution with their

own hands.
For instance, every new discovery about the complex structure of the
protein puts forth the fact that this structure can not be formed through
coincidences again and again. However, even though Darwinists are very
well aware of the fact that a single protein cannot be formed by coinci-
dences and that the new found information confirm this truth, they still
are advocating this theory persistently.

No doubt, it is a most contradictory and dishonest situation. It is ex-
tremely meaningless for these people to attempt to defend this theory per-
sistently while they find evidence that totally demolishes it. Yet that is ex-
actly their current position.
Indeed, ever since the theory of evolution was first put forward, no
scientist espoused it because of the scientific evidence. It is impossible for
them to defend the theory with this reason, because there is not even a
single piece of evidence that would support evolution. What, then, is evo-
lutionists' aim? And what can explain their inconsistent mindset?

The British zoologist D. M. S. Watson, himself an evolutionist, sup-
plies the answer to those questions:
The theory of evolution (is) a theory universally accepted not because it
can be proved by logically coherent evidence to be true but because the
only alternative, special creation is clearly incredible. 1

This idea of Watson's is shared by scientists who espouse the theory
of evolution. These others are well aware that no evidence proves the the-
ory, but if they abandoned the theory of evolution, they would have to ad-
mit the existence of a Creator. Such a thing is unacceptable for proponents
of materialist ideology, which we will be examining in due course.
However, the great majority of people, being unaware of this, imag-
ine that all the scientists who support evolution have worked along ex-

ceedingly scientific lines, with methods based solely on experiment and
observation. Therefore, they believe every word those scientists say, feel-
ing no need to investigate any further.