Page 30 - Confessions of the Evolutionists
P. 30

28               CONFESSIONS OF THE EVOLUTIONISTS




                   Dr. Lewis Thomas, the author of Lives of a Cell:

                   Biology needs a better word than error for the driving force in evolution....
                   I cannot make my peace with the randomness doctrine; I cannot abide the
                   notion of purposelessness and blind chance in nature. And yet I do not
                   know what to put in its place for the quieting of my mind. 29
                   Jerry Coyne is of the Chicago University Evolution and Ecology
              Department:
                   We conclude-unexpectedly-that there is little evidence for the neo-
                   Darwinian view: its theoretical foundations and the experimental evidence
                   supporting it are weak. 30
                   H. S. Lipson, the British physicist:
                   I have always been slightly suspicious of the theory of evolution because of
                   its ability to account for any property of living beings (the long neck of the
                   giraffe, for example). I have therefore tried to see whether biological dis-
                   coveries over the last thirty years or so fit in with Darwin's theory. I do not
                   think that they do. To my mind, the theory does not stand up at all. 31
                   Gregory Alan Pesely is professor of philosophy:
                   One would immediately reject any lexicographer who tried to define a
                   word by the same word, or a thinker who merely restated his proposition,
                   or any other instance of gross redundancy; yet no one seems scandalized
                   that men of science should be satisfied with a major principle which is no
                   more than a tautology. 32

                   Dr. Colin Patterson is an evolutionist paleontologist and curator of
              London's Natural History Museum, editor of the museum's journal and
              author of the book Evolution:
                   Now, one of the reasons I started taking this anti-evolutionary view-well, let's
                   call it non-evolutionary-was [that] last year I had a sudden realization. For
                   over twenty years, I had thought that I was working on evolution in some
                   way. One morning I woke up, and something had happened in the night, and
                   it struck me that I had been working on this stuff for twenty years, and there
                   was not one thing I knew about it. That was quite a shock, to learn that one
                   can be so misled for so long... So for the last few weeks, I've tried putting a
                   simple question to various people and groups of people.

                   The question is this: 'Can you tell me anything you know about evolution,
                   any one thing, any one thing that you think is true? Is there one thing you
   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35