Page 60 - Confessions of the Evolutionists
P. 60

58               CONFESSIONS OF THE EVOLUTIONISTS




                   amoeba to man, as if the amoeba were the simple beginning of the
                   process. On the contrary, if, as must almost necessarily be true, life arose
                   as a simple molecular system, the progression from this state to that of the
                   amoeba is at least as great as from amoeba to man. 137
                   Prof. Michael Pitman is chief scientist of Australia and foreign sec-
              retary of the Australian Academy of Science:

                   Time is no help. Bio-molecules outside a living system tend to degrade
                   with time, not build up. In most cases, a few days is all they would last.
                   Time decomposes complex systems. If a large 'word' (a protein) or even a
                   paragraph is generated by chance, time will operate to degrade it. The
                   more time you allow, the less chance there is that fragmentary 'sense' will
                   survive the chemical maelstrom of matter. 138
                   John Maynard Smith and Eors Szathmary:
                   [accounting for the origin of this system remains] perhaps the most per-
                   plexing problem in evolutionary biology, because the existing translation-
                   al machinery is at the same time so complex, so universal and so essential
                   that it is hard to see how it could have come into existence or how life
                   could have existed without it. 139



                   Evolutionists' Confessions Stating That DNA Cannot
                   Form by Chance
                   Mathematics has now proven that chance plays no role in the forma-

              tion of the data encoded in DNA. The word "impossible" fails to do jus-
              tice to the probability of just one of the 30,000 genes making up DNA
              forming by chance, let alone a DNA molecule consisting of billions of
              components.
                   The evolutionist Ric¬hard Daw¬kins describes the complexity

              within the cell thus:
                   Physics books may be complicated, but... the objects and phenomena that
                   a physics book describes are simpler than a single cell in the body of its
                   author. And the author consists of trillions of those cells ... organised with
                   intricate architecture and precision-engineering into a working machine
                   capable of writing a book. ... Each nucleus ... contains a digitally-coded
   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65