Page 126 - The Dark Spell of Darwinism
P. 126

The Dark Spell of Darwinism




                 One of the most serious problems faced by these scientists subjected to
            pressure occurs during the publication of their articles in scientific periodi-
            cals. Most well-known journals are controlled by people under the influ-
            ence of the Darwinist spell, and they do not accept for publication articles
            by pro-Creationist scientists, so they cannot circulate their evidence against
            the theory of evolution.
                 Besides this, pro-Creationist scientists meet with many difficulties in
            the universities where they teach. To become a professor or to wield any in-
            fluence in universities where the majority of the faculty is Darwinist, an in-
            dividual must accept the theory of evolution. Those who do not accept this
            precondition are given no consideration or respect. Furthermore, attempts
            are even made to intimidate and deride them.
                 This is one of the evolutionists' most effective methods of suggestion
            used to perpetuate the Darwinist spell. For that reason, it will be useful to
            examine it in a little more depth.


                 The Darwinists' Weapon of "Defamation"
                 Defamation is a morally evil attempt to harm another person and to
            humiliate him before his peers. Those who practice it also hope to elevate
            themselves to the forefront and receive the respect of others. For Darwinists
            who seek to win respect for their theory and harm their pro-Creationist col-
            leagues, defamation is an indispensable tool. For this reason, it's the very
            basis of the Darwinist spell.
                 Everything that is said and written in evolutionist circles, their facial
            expressions and the way they look, is peppered with defamatory state-
            ments. Knowing that they cannot succeed on a scientific platform, they treat
            pro-Creationist scientists so as to destroy them psychologically. When
            proofs for the fact of Creation are presented to them, they make their puny

            statements twisting their mouths, eyes and eyebrows into scornful expres-
            sions. In this way, they hope to cover up their deficiencies and lack of
            knowledge. For example, one of the main proponents of the theory of evo-
            lution today is Richard Dawkins, who also makes frequent use of this dis-
                                             124
   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131