Page 178 - Miracles Within the Molecule
P. 178

HArun yahya


                  Moreover, a certain segment of humans classified as Homo erectus
               have lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens neandarthalen-
               sis and Homo sapiens sapiens (man) co-existed in the same region. 89
                  This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim that
               they are ancestors of one another. The late Stephen Jay Gould explained
               this deadlock of the theory of evolution although he was himself one of
               the leading advocates of evolution in the twentieth century:
                    What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineag-
                    es of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H.
                    habilis), none clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of the
                    three display any evolutionary trends during their tenure on
                    earth. 90
                  Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is "upheld" with
               the help of various drawings of some "half ape, half human" creatures
               appearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by means of
               propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.
                  Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected scien-
               tists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years and
               studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded, despite
               being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such family tree
               branching out from ape-like creatures to man.
                  Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science" ranging
               from those he considered scientific to those he considered unscientific.
               According to Zuckerman's spectrum, the most "scientific"–that is,
               depending on concrete data–fields of science are chemistry and physics.
               After them come the biological sciences and then the social sciences. At
               the far end of the spectrum, which is the part considered to be most
               "unscientific," are "extra-sensory perception"–concepts such as telepathy
               and sixth sense–and finally "human evolution." Zuckerman explains his
               reasoning:
                    We then move right off the register of objective truth into those
                    fields of presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception
                    or the interpretation of man's fossil history, where to the faithful



                                              176
   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183