Page 124 - Character Types of the Unbelievers

CHARACTER-TYPES OF THE UNBELIEVERS
erectus have lived up until very modern times. Homo sapiens ne-
andarthalensis and Homo sapiens sapiens (present-day man) co-
existed in the same region. 17
This situation apparently indicates the invalidity of the claim

that they are ancestors of one another. The late Stephen Jay Gould
explained this deadlock of the theory of evolution although he was
himself one of the leading advocates of evolution in the twentieth
century:
What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of ho-
minids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis), none
clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display any evo-
lutionary trends during their tenure on earth. 18

Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is “upheld”
with the help of various drawings of some “half ape, half human”
creatures appearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly,
by means of propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific
foundation.
Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected
scientists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for
years and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally con-

cluded, despite being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact,
no such family tree branching out from ape-like creatures to man.
Zuckerman also made an interesting “spectrum of science”
ranging from those he considered scientific to those he considered
unscientific. According to Zuckerman’s spectrum, the most “scien-
tific”—that is, depending on concrete data—fields of science are
chemistry and physics. After them come the biological sciences and

then the social sciences. At the far end of the spectrum, which is the

122