Page 152 - The Evolution Deceit

150 THE EV O LU TION DE CEIT

isolated, so that it would not allow the leaking of any harmful, destructive,
or any other kind of elements to hinder the formation of amino acids. No
elements, minerals or compounds that were likely to have been present on
the primordial earth, but which would have changed the course of the re-
actions, were included in the experiment. Oxygen, which would have pre-
vented the formation of amino acids because of oxidation, is only one of
these destructive elements. Even under such ideal laboratory conditions, it
was impossible for the amino acids produced to survive and avoid de-
struction without the "cold trap" mechanism.
In fact, by his experiment, Miller destroyed evolution's claim that "life
emerged as the result of unconscious coincidences". That is because, if the
experiment proves anything, it is that amino acids can only be produced in a
controlled laboratory environment where all the conditions are specifically
designed by conscious intervention. That is, the power that brings about life
cannot be by unconscious chance but rather by Creation.
The reason evolutionists do not accept this evident reality is their
blind adherence to prejudices that are totally unscientific. Interestingly
enough, Harold Urey, who organised the Miller experiment with his stu-
dent Stanley Miller, made the following confession on the subject:
All of us who study the origin of life find that the more we look into it, the
more we feel it is too complex to have evolved anywhere. We all believe as
an article of faith that life evolved from dead matter on this planet. It is just
that its complexity is so great, it is hard for us to imagine that it did. 122

Primordial World Atmosphere and Proteins
Evolutionist sources use the Miller experiment, despite all of its in-
consistencies, to try to gloss over the question of the origin of amino acids.
By giving the impression that the issue has long since been resolved by
that invalid experiment, they try to paper over the cracks in the theory of
evolution.
However, to explain the second stage of the origin of life, evolution-
ists faced an even greater problem than that of the formation of amino
acids-namel, the origin of proteins, the building blocks of life, which are
composed of hundreds of different amino acids bonding with each other
in a particular order.
Claiming that proteins were formed by chance under natural condi-