Page 161 - The Evolution Deceit

The Mo lec u lar Im passe of Ev o lu tion 159

In short, the theory of evolution is unable to
prove any of the evolutionary stages that allegedly
occur at the molecular level. Rather than providing
answers to such questions, the progress of science ren-
ders them even more complex and inextricable.
Interestingly enough, most evolutionists be-
lieve in this and similar totally unscientific fairy tales
as if they were true. Because they have conditioned
themselves not to accept creation, they have no other
Prof. Francis Crick:
choice than to believe in the impossible. One famous "The origin of life ap-
biologist from Australia, Michael Denton, discusses pears to be almost
a miracle."
the subject in his book Evolution: A Theory in Crisis:
To the skeptic, the proposition that the genetic pro-
grammes of higher organisms, consisting of some-
thing close to a thousand million bits of information, equivalent to the sequence
of letters in a small library of 1,000 volumes, containing in encoded form count-
less thousands of intricate algorithms controlling, specifying, and ordering the
growth and development of billions and billions of cells into the form of a com-
plex organism, were composed by a purely random process is simply an af-
front to reason. But to the Darwinist, the idea is accepted without a ripple of
doubt-the paradigm takes precedence! 132

Another Evolutionist Vain Attempt:
"The RNA World"
The discovery in the 1970s that the gasses originally existing in the
primitive atmosphere of the earth would have rendered amino acid syn-
thesis impossible was a serious blow to the theory of molecular evolution.
Evolutionists then had to face the fact that the "primitive atmosphere ex-
periments" by Stanley Miller, Sydney Fox, Cyril Ponnamperuma and oth-
ers were invalid. For this reason, in the 1980s the evolutionists tried again.
As a result, the "RNA World" hypothesis was advanced. This scenario pro-
posed that, not proteins, but rather the RNA molecules that contained the
information for proteins, were formed first.
According to this scenario, advanced by Harvard chemist Walter
Gilbert in 1986, based on a discovery about "ribozymes" by Thomas Cech ,
billions of years ago an RNA molecule capable of replicating itself formed
somehow by accident. Then this RNA molecule started to produce pro-
teins, having been activated by external influences. Thereafter, it became