Page 185 - The Evolution Deceit

Why Ev o lu tion ists' Claims Are Invalid 183

VARIATIONS WITHIN SPECIES DO NOT IMPLY EVOLUTION

Variations within Species Do Not Imply Evolution

In The Origin of Species, Darwin confused two separate concepts: variations
within a species and the emergence of an entirely new one. Darwin observed the
variety within the various breeds of dogs, for example, and imagined that some of
these variations would one day turn into a different species. Even today evolu-
tionists persist in seeking to portray variations within species as “evolution”.
However, it is a scientific fact that variations within a species are not evolution.
For instance, no matter how many breeds of dog there are, these will always re-
main a single species. No transition from one distinct species to another will ever
take place.

species of reptile, since information for both long-legged and short-legged
forms may exist in the gene pool that species. However, variations do not
transform reptiles into birds by adding wings or feathers to them, or by
changing their metabolism. Such a change requires an increase in the ge-
netic information of the living thing, which is certainly not possible
through variations.
Darwin was not aware of this fact when he formulated his theory. He
thought that there was no limit to variations. In an article he wrote in 1844