Page 214 - The Evolution Deceit

212 THE EVOLUTION DECEIT

Wrapped-up Lies
Evolutionists make great use of the advantage given to them by the
"brain-washing" program of the media. Many people believe in evolution
so unconditionally that they do not even bother to ask "how" and "why".
This means that evolutionists can package their lies so as to be easily per-
suasive.
For instance, even in the most "scientific" evolutionist books the "tran-
sition from water to land", which is one of the greatest unaccounted-for
phenomena of evolution, is "explained" with ridiculous simplicity. Ac-
cording to evolution, life started in water and the first developed animals
were fish. The theory has it that one day these fish started to fling them-
selves on to the land for some reason or other, (most of the time, drought is
said to be the reason), and the fish that chose to live on land, happened to
have feet instead of fins, and lungs instead of gills.
Most evolutionist books do not tell the "how" of the subject. Even in
the most "scientific" sources, the absurdity of this assertion is concealed be-
hind sentences such as "the transfer from water to land was achieved".
How was this "transfer" achieved? We know that a fish cannot live for
more than a few minutes out of water. If we suppose that the alleged
drought occurred and the fish had to move towards the land, what would
have happened to the fish? The response is evident. All of the fish coming
out of the water would die one by one in a few minutes. Even if this process
had had lasted for a period of ten million years, the answer would still be the
same: fish would die one by one. The reason is that such a complex organ as
a complete lung cannot come into being by a sudden "accident", that is, by
mutation; but half a lung, on the other hand, is of no use at all.
But this is exactly what the evolutionists propose. "Transfer from
water to land", "transfer from land to air" and many more alleged leaps
are "explained" in these illogical terms. As for the formation of really com-
plex organs such as the eye and ear, evolutionists prefer not to say any-
thing at all.
It is easy to influence the man on the street with the package of "sci-
ence". You draw an imaginary picture representing transfer from water to
land, you invent Latin words for the animal in the water, its "descendant"
on land, and the "transitional intermediary form" (which is an imaginary
animal), and then fabricate an elaborate lie: "Eusthenopteron transformed