Page 268 - The Evolution Deceit
P. 268

266                   THE EVOLUTION DECEIT



            cake in his stomach after eating a cake, were connected to a second person's
            brain in parallel, that person would also feel full when Engels ate the cake
            and was satiated. If the nerves of Johnson, who felt pain in his foot when he
            delivered a sound kick to a stone, were connected to a second person in par-
            allel, that person would feel the same pain.
                 So, which cake or which stone is the real one? The materialist philosophy
            again falls short of giving a consistent answer to this question. The correct and
            consistent answer is this: both Engels and the second person have eaten the
            cake in their minds and are satiated; both Johnson and the second person
            have fully experienced the moment of striking the stone in their minds.
                 Let us make a change in the example we gave about Politzer: let us con-
            nect the nerves of the man hit by the bus to Politzer's brain, and the nerves
            of Politzer sitting in his house to that man's brain, who is hit by the bus. In
            this case, Politzer will think that a bus has hit him, although sitting at home;
            and the man actually hit by the bus will never feel the impact of the accident
            and think that he is sitting in Politzer's house. The very same logic may be
            applied to the cake and the stone examples.
                 As is evident, it is not possible for man to transcend his senses and
            break free of them. In this respect, a man's soul can be subjected to all kinds
            of representations, although it has no physical body and no material exis-
            tence and lacks material weight. It is not possible for a person to realise this
            because he assumes these three-dimensional images to be real and is
            absolutely certain of their existence, because everybody depends on the per-
            ceptions stemming from his sensory organs.
                 The famous British philosopher David Hume expresses his thoughts
            on this fact:
                 For my part, when I enter most intimately into what I call myself, I always
                 stumble on some particular perception or other, of heat or cold, light or shade,
                 love or hatred, pain or pleasure. I never can catch myself at any time without
                 a perception, and never can observe any thing but the perception. 210


                 The Formation of Perceptions in the Brain is not
                 Philosophy but Scientific Fact
                 Materialists claim that what we have been presenting here is a philo-
            sophical view. However, to hold that we never have direct experience of the
            original of the "external world" is not a matter of philosophy but a plain sci-
   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273