Page 308 - The Evolution Deceit

NOTES

1. Cliff, Conner, «Evolution vs. Creationism: In 15Jerry Coyne, «Not Black and White», a review
Defense of Scientific Thinking», International of Michael Majerus’s Melanism: Evolution in
Socialist Review (Monthly Magazine Supple- Action, Nature, 396 (1988), pp. 35-36
ment to the Militant), November 1980. 16 Stephen Jay Gould, «The Return of Hopeful
2 Ali Demirsoy, Kalı tı m ve Evrim (Inheritance Monsters», Natural History, Vol 86, July-Au-
and Evolution), Ankara: Meteksan Publishing gust 1977, p. 28.
Co., 1984, p. 61. 17 Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A
3 Michael J. Behe, Darwin’s Black Box, New Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard Uni-
York: Free Press, 1996, pp. 232-233. versity Press, 1964, p. 189.
4 Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker, Lon- 18 Ibid, p. 177.
don: W. W. Norton, 1986, p. 159. 19 B. G. Ranganathan, Origins?, Pennsylvania:
5 Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution: Science or The Banner Of Truth Trust, 1988.
Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About 20 Warren Weaver, «Genetic Effects of Atomic
Evolution is Wrong, Regnery Publishing, Radiation», Science, Vol 123, June 29, 1956,
2000, pp. 235-236 p. 1159.
6 Dan Graves, Science of Faith: Forty-Eight Bi- 21 Gordon R. Taylor, The Great Evolution Mys-
ographies of Historic Scientists and Their tery, New York: Harper & Row, 1983, p. 48.
Christian Faith, Grand Rapids, MI, Kregel Re- 22 Michael Pitman, Adam and Evolution, Lon-
sources. don: River Publishing, 1984, p. 70.
7 Science, Philosophy, And Religion: A Sympo- 23 Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A
sium, 1941, CH.13. Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard Uni-
8 Max Planck, Where is Science Going?, versity Press, 1964, p. 179.
www.websophia. 24 Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species, Ox-
com/aphorisms/science.html. ford University Press, New York, 1998, pp.
9 H. S. Lipson, «A Physicist’s View of Darwin’s 140, 141, 227.
Theory», Evolution Trends in Plants, Vol 2, 25 Derek V. Ager, «The Nature of the Fossil
No. 1, 1988, p. 6. Record», Proceedings of the British Geologi-
10 Although Darwin came up with the claim cal Association, Vol 87, 1976, p. 133.
that his theory was totally independent from 26 Mark Czarnecki, «The Revival of the Cre-
that of Lamarck’s, he gradually started to rely ationist Crusade», MacLean’s, January 19,
on Lamarck’s assertions. Especially the 6th 1981, p. 56.
and the last edition of The Origin of Species 27 R. Wesson, Beyond Natural Selection, MIT
is full of examples of Lamarck‘s «inheritance Press, Cambridge, MA, 1991, p. 45
of acquired traits». See Benjamin Farrington, 28 David Raup, «Conflicts Between Darwin and
What Darwin Really Said, New York: Paleontology», Bulletin, Field Museum of
Schocken Books, 1966, p. 64. Natural History, Vol 50, January 1979, p. 24.
11Michael Ruse, «Nonliteralist Antievolution», 29 Richard Monastersky, «Mysteries of the Ori-
AAAS Symposium: «The New Antievolution- ent», Discover, April 1993, p. 40.
ism,» February 13, 1993, Boston, MA 30 Richard Fortey, «The Cambrian Explosion Ex-
12Steven M. Stanley, Macroevolution: Pattern ploded?», Science, vol 293, No 5529, 20
and Process, San Francisco: W. H. Freeman July 2001, p. 438-439.
and Co. 1979, pp. 35, 159. 31 Ibid.
13Colin Patterson, «Cladistics», Interview with 32 Richard Dawkins, The Blind Watchmaker,
Brian Leek, Peter Franz, March 4, 1982, London: W. W. Norton 1986, p. 229.
BBC. 33 Douglas J. Futuyma, Science on Trial, New
14Jonathan Wells, Icons of Evolution: Science or York: Pantheon Books, 1983, p. 197.
Myth? Why Much of What We Teach About 34 Charles Darwin, The Origin of Species: A
Evolution is Wrong, Regnery Publishing, Facsimile of the First Edition, Harvard Uni-
2000, pp. 141-151 versity Press, 1964, p. 302.