Page 133 - Knowing The Truth
P. 133
Harun Yahya (Adnan Oktar) 131
creatures appearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by
means of propaganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific
foundation.
Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected
scientists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years
and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded,
despite being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such
family tree branching out from ape-like creatures to man.
Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science"
ranging from those he considered scientific to those he considered
unscientific. According to Zuckerman's spectrum, the most
"scientific"—that is, depending on concrete data—fields of science are
chemistry and physics. After them come the biological sciences and
then the social sciences. At the far end of the spectrum, which is the
part considered to be most "unscientific," are "extra-sensory
perception"—concepts such as telepathy and sixth sense—and finally
"human evolution." Zuckerman explains his reasoning:
We then move right off the register of objective truth into those fields
of presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception or the
interpretation of man's fossil history, where to the faithful
[evolutionist] anything is possible – and where the ardent believer
[in evolution] is sometimes able to believe several contradictory
things at the same time. 29
The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but the
prejudiced interpretations of some fossils unearthed by certain people,
who blindly adhere to their theory.
Darwinian Formula!
Besides all the technical evidence we have dealt with so far, let us
now for once, examine what kind of a superstition the evolutionists
have with an example so simple as to be understood even by children: