Page 194 - Only Love Can Defeat Terrorism
P. 194

Only Love Can Defeat Terrorism




                   He squeezes the entire universe in a pitch-dark place of a few cu-
                   bic centimeters in a three-dimensional, colored, shadowy, and lu-
                   minous form.


                        A Materialist Faith
                        The information we have presented so far shows us that the
                   theory of evolution is incompatible with scientific findings. The
                   theory's claim regarding the origin of life is inconsistent with sci-
                   ence, the evolutionary mechanisms it proposes have no evolution-
                   ary power, and fossils demonstrate that the required intermediate
                   forms have never existed. So, it certainly follows that the theory of
                   evolution should be pushed aside as an unscientific idea. This is
                   how many ideas, such as the Earth-centered universe model, have
                   been taken out of the agenda of science throughout history.
                        However, the theory of evolution is kept on the agenda of
                   science. Some people even try to represent criticisms directed
                   against it as an "attack on science." Why?
                        The reason is that this theory is an indispensable dogmatic
                   belief for some circles. These circles are blindly devoted to mate-
                   rialist philosophy and adopt Darwinism because it is the only
                   materialist explanation that can be put forward to explain the
                   workings of nature.
                        Interestingly enough, they also confess this fact from time to
                   time. A well-known geneticist and an outspoken evolutionist,
                   Richard C. Lewontin from Harvard University, confesses that he
                   is "first and foremost a materialist and then a scientist":
                        It is not that the methods and institutions of science somehow com-
                        pel us accept a material explanation of the phenomenal world, but,
                        on the contrary, that we are forced by our a priori adherence to ma-
                        terial causes to create an apparatus of investigation and a set of
                        concepts that produce material explanations, no matter how






                                              192
   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199