Page 219 - If Darwin Had Known about DNA

Adnan Oktar

217

creased." 148 (For details, see Harun Yahya, Darwinism Refuted,
Goodword Books, 2002.) In the same way, the claim put forward by ev-

olutionists, that a large part of DNA serves no purpose, has also been
discredited by recent discoveries.
The Human Genome Project and other genetic research have es-
tablished that during the process of protein manufacture, genes con-
stantly interact with one another. During this process, one gene does
not act independently of other sections of DNA. As one gene works-
particularly during the early stages of protein coding-sections of DNA
that do not constitute genes regulate it. For that reason, no scientist who
closely monitors such research any longer attaches any validity to the
concept of junk DNA.
Even though evolutionists may not welcome the fact, those sec-
tions of DNA once claimed to be junk are actually in a constant state of
activity and have various functions as yet undiscovered has been
around for some time. In Science magazine, a team of molecular biolo-

gists from the Harvard Medical Faculty and physicists from Boston
University shed light on this subject in a 1994 report titled "Does non-
sense DNA speak its own dialect?" 149 Based on their study
of 37 DNA strips containing 50,000 base
pairs, taken from various liv-
ing things, they re-
ported that so-
called junk
DNA, which occu-
pies 90% of human
DNA, is actually writ-
ten in a special lan-
guage. Their tests revealed
that the DNA described as
"junk" was by no means mean-