Page 301 - Death of the Darwinist Dajjal System

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya)

of hominids (A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. ha-
bilis), none clearly derived from another? Moreover, none of the three
display any evolutionary trends during their tenure on earth. 189
Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is "upheld" with
the help of various drawings of some "half ape, half human" creatures ap-

pearing in the media and course books, that is, frankly, by means of pro-
paganda, is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.
Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected scien-
tists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years and
studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded, despite be-
ing an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such family tree
branching out from ape-like creatures to man.
Zuckerman also made an interesting "spectrum of science" ranging from
those he considered scientific to those he considered unscientific. According
to Zuckerman's spectrum, the most "scientific" – that is, depending on con-
crete data – fields of science are chemistry and physics. After them come the

biological sciences and then the social sciences. At the far end of the spectrum,
which is the part considered to be most "unscientific," are "extra-sensory per-
ception" – concepts such as telepathy and sixth sense – and finally "human
evolution." Zuckerman explains his reasoning:
We then move right off the register of objective truth into those fields
of presumed biological science, like extrasensory perception or the in-
terpretation of man's fossil history, where to the faithful [evolutionist]

anything is possible – and where the ardent believer [in evolution] is
sometimes able to believe several contradictory things at the same
time. 190
The tale of human evolution boils down to nothing but the preju-
diced interpretations of some fossils unearthed by certain people, who
blindly adhere to their theory.

299