Page 133 - The Transitional Form Dilemma
P. 133

HARUN YAHYA





              people bore a surprising resemblance to H. erectus. Laughlin concluded
              that all these “species” were in reality different races of H. sapiens—or
              present-day Man:
                   When we consider the vast differences that exist between remote groups such as
                   Eskimos and Bushmen, who are known to belong within the single species of
                   Homo sapiens, it seems justifiable to conclude that Sinanthropus belongs
                   within this same diverse species. 108
                   Increasingly, scientific magazines are referring to H. erectus as

              being an artificial classification, and to the fossils included within the
              category H. erectus as insufficiently different from H. sapiens to be con-
              sidered a separate species. American Scientist summarizes the debate on
              the issue and the outcome of a conference held in 2000:
                   . . . most of the participants at the Senckenberg conference got drawn into a
                   flaming debate over the taxonomic status of Homo erectus, started by Milford
                   Wolpoff of the University of Michigan, Alan Thorne of the University of
                   Canberra and their colleagues. They argued forcefully that Homo erectus had
                   no validity as a species and should be eliminated altogether. All members of the
                   genus Homo, from about 2 million years ago to the present, were one highly
                   variable, widely spread species, Homo sapiens, with no natural breaks or subdi-
                   visions. The subject of the conference, Homo erectus, didn’t exist.  109
                   Scientists who support this thesis reached the conclusion that H.
              erectus is not a different species, but a race within Homo sapiens.
                   There is a huge gulf between H. erectus, a human race, and the apes
              that precede it in the “human evolution” scenario (Australopithecus, H.
              habilis and H. rudolfensis). To put it another way, the first humans identi-
              fied in the fossil record appeared suddenly and simultaneously, with no
              evolutionary process.



                   Homo sapiens archaic,
                   Homo sapiens archaic,
                   Homo heilderbergensis and Cro-Magnon
                   Homo heilderbergensis and Cro-Magnon
                   In the imaginary evolutionary tree, H. sapiens archaic represents the






                                            131
   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138