Page 303 - Islam Denounces Terrorism

Adnan Oktar (Harun Yahya) 301

ancestors of one another. The late Stephen Jay Gould explained this
deadlock of the theory of evolution, although he was himself one of the
leading advocates of evolution in the twentieth century:
What has become of our ladder if there are three coexisting lineages of hominids
(A. africanus, the robust australopithecines, and H. habilis), none clearly
derived from another? Moreover, none of the three display any evolutionary
trends during their tenure on earth. (S. J. Gould, Natural History, vol. 85,
1976, p. 30)

Put briefly, the scenario of human evolution, which is “upheld”
with the help of various drawings of some “half ape, half human” crea-

tures appearing in the media and textbooks, that is, frankly, propagan-
da, is nothing but a tale with no scientific foundation.
Lord Solly Zuckerman, one of the most famous and respected sci-
entists in the U.K., who carried out research on this subject for years
and studied Australopithecus fossils for 15 years, finally concluded,
despite being an evolutionist himself, that there is, in fact, no such
family tree branching out from ape-like creatures to man.

FALSE

There are no fossil remains that support the tale of
human evolution. On the contrary, the fossil record
shows that there is an insurmountable barrier between
apes and men. In the face of this truth, evolutionists
fixed their hopes on certain drawings and models.
They randomly place masks on the fossil remains and
fabricate imaginary half-ape, half-human faces.