Page 37 - pwc-lease-accounting-guide_Neat
P. 37

Scope



                       Analysis

                       In this scenario, there would still be two units of account at inception, and consideration would be
                       allocated to each unit of account based on stand-alone selling prices at that date. However, because the
                       lease would not commence until June 30 when the subsection is identified, any amounts allocated to
                       the lease component would not be recognized until June 30. Accounting for arrangements that (1)
                       involve the right to use an asset to be specified in the future and (2) contain more than one unit of
                       account, can be challenging. The application of the model depends on the facts and circumstances of
                       each arrangement, which should be carefully evaluated.


                       In ASU 2018-01, Land Easement Practical Expedient for Transition to Topic 842, the FASB provided
                       guidance on an optional transition practical expedient to not evaluate under ASC 842 existing or
                       expired land easements that were not previously accounted for as leases under ASC 840. Instead,
                       reporting entities that elect this practical expedient would continue their current accounting for land
                       easements that existed prior to the entity’s adoption date. All land easements arrangements entered
                       after a reporting entity’s adoption date are required to be evaluated under ASC 842. This practical
                       expedient can be elected independent of all other practical expedients. See LG 10 for further
                       discussion of practical expedients and transition considerations.

            2.3.2.2    Right to direct the use of the identified asset

                       The second criterion in the control assessment is the right to direct the use of the identified asset.
                       Decisions about how and for what purpose an asset will be used are the most relevant factors to
                       consider when assessing which party directs the use of the identified asset. A reporting entity should
                       give the most weight to the factors that have the greatest impact on the economic benefit to be derived
                       from that asset.

                       Figure 2-2 illustrates the analysis that should be used to determine which party has the right to direct
                       the use of an identified asset.





































                                                                                                             2-16
   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42