Page 95 - pwc-lease-accounting-guide_Neat

Lease classification

Residual value guarantees obtained from a third party

If a residual value guarantee is provided by a third party unrelated to the lessor, and none of the other
criteria in ASC 842-10-25-2 are met, the lessor should evaluate whether the lease should be classified
as a direct financing lease. A lessor would classify a lease as a direct financing lease if the lease meets
both of the criteria in ASC 842-10-25-3(b).

ASC 842-10-25-3

When none of the criteria in paragraph 842-10-25-2 are met:

a. A lessee shall classify the lease as an operating lease.

b. A lessor shall classify the lease as either a direct financing lease or an operating lease. A lessor
shall classify the lease as an operating lease unless both of the following criteria are met, in which
case the lessor shall classify the lease as a direct financing lease:

1. The present value of the sum of the lease payments and any residual value guaranteed by the
lessee that is not already reflected in the lease payments in accordance with paragraph 842-
10-30-5(f) and/or any other third party unrelated to the lessor equals or exceeds substantially
all of the fair value of the underlying asset.

2. It is probable that the lessor will collect the lease payments plus any amount necessary to
satisfy a residual value guarantee.

For a lease to be classified as a direct financing lease, the lease payments and any amount necessary to
satisfy a residual value guarantee should be probable of collection at lease commencement. If the
lessor determines collection is not probable, the lease should be classified as an operating lease. See
LG 3.3.4.7 for information on collectibility.

Example 3-15 illustrates the effect of a residual value guarantee on lease classification.

EXAMPLE 3-15

Residual value guarantee – third party

Lessor Corp enters into a lease of non-specialized construction equipment with Lessee Corp. The fair
value of the equipment at lease commencement is $500,000. Lessee Corp does not provide a residual
value guarantee.

Lessor Corp estimates that the fair value of the construction equipment at the end of the lease will be
$150,000. While Lessor Corp acknowledges the value of the asset may decline below $150,000 in the
future, Lessor Corp concludes there is less than a 1% chance of the value falling below $100,000.
Therefore, to protect its investment, Lessor Corp obtains residual value insurance from a third party
covering any loss incurred by Lessor Corp if the value declines to between $150,000 to $100,000. That
is, if the residual value falls below $150,000, Lessor is covered for the first $50,000 of loss. The risk of
loss associated with the value of the equipment falling below $100,000 is retained by Lessor Corp.

Assume Lessor Corp has already evaluated the lease classification criteria and concluded the lease is
not a sales-type lease.

3-29