Page 321 - MOSAD BIYALIK-zochalim.MOSAD BIYALIK-zochalim.1A
P. 321
Pg: 321 - 21-Front 21-06-15
321 מקורות לועזיים283
385. Citron, M.C. & Pinto, L.H., 1973. Retinal image: Larger 400. Conrad, J.L., 2008. Phylogeny and systematics of
and more illuminated for a nocturnal than for a diurnal Squamata (Reptilia) based on morphology, Bulletin of the
lizard, Vision Research, 13: 873–876. American Museum of Natural History, 310: 1–182.
386. Clark, D.R. Jr., 1967. Notes on sexual dimorphism in 401. Cooper, E.L., Klempau, A.E. & Zapata, A.G., 1985.
tail-length in American snakes, Transactions of the Kansas Reptilian immunity, C. Gans, F. Billett & P.F.A. Maderson
Academy of Sciences, 69: 226–232. (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 14, New York: John
Wiley & Sons, 599–678.
387. Clark, D.R. Jr., 1971. The strategy of tail autotomy in the
ground skink, Lygosoma laterale, Journal of Experimental 402. Cooper, J.E. & Jackson, O.F., 1981. Diseases of the
Zoology, 176: 295–302. Reptilia, 2 vols., London: Academic Press.
388. Clark, N.B., 1970. The parathyroid, C. Gans & T.S. 403. Cooper, W.E. Jr., 1990. Prey odor detection by teiid and
Parsons (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 3, London & lacertid lizards and the relationship of prey odor detection
New York: Academic Press: 235–262. to foraging mode in lizard families, Copeia, 1990: 237–242.
389. Clark, P.J., Ewert, M.A. & Nelson, C.E., 2001. Physical 404a. Cooper, W.E. Jr., 1994. Chapter 5: Prey chemical
apertures as constrains on egg size and shape in the common discrimination, foraging mode, and phylogeny, L.J.
musk turtle, Sternotherus odoratus, Functional Ecology, Vitt & E.R. Pianka (Eds.), Lizard ecology: historical
15: 70–77. and experimental perspectives, New Jersey: Princeron
University Press: 95–116.
390a. Clark, R.J. & Clark, E.D., 1970. Notes on four lizard
species from the Peloponnese, Greece: Algyroides moreoticus 404b. Cooper, W.E. Jr., 1995. Foraging mode, prey chemical
Bibron and Bory, Anguis fragilis peloponnesiacus Stepanek, discrimination, and phylogeny in lizards, Animal Behaviour,
Ophiomorus punctatissimus (Bibron and Bory) and 50: 973–985.
Ophisaurus apodus (Pallas), British Journal of Herpetology,
4: 135–137. 405. Cooper, W.E. Jr., 1999. Supplementation of phylogenetically
correct data by two-species comparison: support for
390b. Clark, R.J. , Clark, E.D., Anderson, S.C. & Leviton, correlated evolution of foraging mode and prey chemical
A.E., 1969. Report on a collection of amphibians and reptiles discrimination in lizards extended by first intrageneric
from Afghanistan, Proceedings of the California Academy evidence, Oikos, 87: 97–104.
Sciences, Ser. 4, 36: 279–315.
406. Cooper, W.E. Jr., 2005. The foraging mode controversy:
391. Claussen, M. & Gayler, V., 1997. The greening of both continuous variation and clustering of foraging
the Sahara during the Mid-Holocene: Results of an movements occur, Journal of Zoology, 267: 179–190.
interactive Atmosphere-Biome model, Global Ecology
and Biogeography Letters, 6: 369–377. 407. Cooper, W.E. Jr., 2006. Risk factors affecting escape
behaviour by Puerto Rican Anolis lizards, Canadian Journal
392. Cogger, H.G., 1974. Thermal relation of the Mallee Dragon of Zoology, 84: 495–504.
Amphibolurus fordi (Lacertilia: Agamidae), Australian
Journal of Zoology, 22: 319–339. 408. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Al-Johany, A.M., 2002. Chemosensory
responses to foods by an herbivorous acrodont lizard,
393. Cole, C.J., 1966a. Femoral glands in lizards: a review, Uromastyx aegyptius, Journal of Ethology, 20: 95–100.
Herpetologica, 22: 199–206.
409. Cooper, W.E. Jr., Al-Johany, A.M., Vitt, L.J. & Habegger,
394. Cole, C.J., 1966b. Femoral glands of the lizard, J.J., 2000. Responses to chemical cues from animal and plant
Crotaphytus collaris, Journal of Morphology, 118: 119–136. foods by actively foraging insectivorous and omnivorous
scincine lizards, Journal of Experimental Zoology, 287:
395. Cole, N.C., 2004. A novel technique for capturing arboreal 327–339.
geckos, Herpetological Review, 35: 358–359.
410. Cooper, W.E. Jr., Garstka, W.R. & Vitt, L.J., 1986.
396. Coleman, J.S., Temple, S.A. & Craven, S.R., 1997. Female sex pheromone in the lizard Eumeces laticeps,
Facts on cats and wildlife: a conservation dilemma, Misc. Herpetologica, 42: 361–366.
Publications, USDA cooperative extension, University of
Wisconsin. 411. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Greenberg, N., 1992. Reptilian
coloration and behaviour, C. Gans & D. Crews (Eds.),
397. Congdon, J.D., Dunham, A.E. & Tinkle, D.W., 1982. Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 18, Chicago & London:
Energy budgets and life histories of reptiles, C. Gans & University of Chicago Press: 298–422.
F.H. Pough (Eds.), Biology of the Reptilia, Vol. 13, London,
New York, Paris, San Diego, São Paulo, Sydney, Tokyo & 412. Cooper, W.E. Jr. & Vitt, L.J., 2002. Distribution, extent,
Toronto: Academic Press: 233–271. and evolution of plant consumption by lizards, Journal of
Zoology, 257: 487–517.
398. Congdon, J.D. & Gibbons, J.W., 1987. Morphological
constraint on egg size – a challenge to optimal egg size 413. Cooper, W.E. Jr., Whiting, M.J., Van Wyk, J.H. & Mouton,
theory, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences P. le F.N., 1999. Movement- and attack-based indices of
of the United States of America, 84: 4145–4147. foraging mode and ambush foraging in some gekkonid and
agamine lizards from southern Africa, Amphibia-Reptilia,
399. Congdon, J.D., Greene, J.L. & Gibbons, J.W., 1986. 20: 391–399.
Biomass of freshwater turtles: A geographic comparison,
American Midland Naturalist, 115: 165–173. 414. Corkill, N.L. & Cochrane, J.A., 1966. The snakes of the
