Page 2 - מיזוגים ורכישת חברות - ברקלי תשפא
P. 2

 Table of Contents

          
Alternative Methods of Protecting Shareholders from Coercive Tender Offers .................. 1 
Unocal Corporation v. Mesa Petroleum Co. ....................................................................... 16 
Perrigo Company PLC v. Mylan N.V.................................................................................. 27 
‫ דילמת עציר לבעלי מניות פריגו‬:‫ הצעת הרכש של מיילן‬................................................................... 32 
40274-09-15 (‫ת"צ )כלכלית ת"א‬Perrigo Company Plc '‫ נ‬Mylan N.V.................................... 34 
‫ גלולת הרעל הגיעה לתל־אביב‬:‫ סכנה למשקיעים‬............................................................................. 51 
55916-02-18 (‫ת"א )מחוזי ת"א‬Payne '‫ נ‬Collinson .................................................................. 54 
Revlon, Inc. v. MacAndrews & Forbes Holdings, Inc. ........................................................ 62 
Barkan v. Amsted Industries, Incorporated......................................................................... 72 
Delaware Supreme Court Strongly Endorses the Power of Boards to Decide How to
Conduct a Sale of the Company Process ............................................................................. 79 
C & J Energy Services, Inc. v. City of Miami General Employees’ and Sanitation Employees’
Retirement Trust .................................................................................................................. 81 
Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC: Delaware Supreme Court Affirms That an
Uncoerced and Fully Informed Disinterested Stockholder Vote Reduces the Standard of
Review in a Merger Without a Controlling Stockholder to Business Judgment ................. 89 
Corwin v. KKR Financial Holdings LLC............................................................................. 91 
In re Synthes, Inc. Shareholder Litigation ......................................................................... 117 
Delaware Court: ‘No Talk’ Provisions No Good .............................................................. 119 
Delaware to Directors: Don’t Do Done Deals .................................................................. 126 
Blasius Industries, Inc. v. Atlas Corporation ..................................................................... 132 
Delaware Supreme Court Decision on Protection of the Stockholder Franchise ............ 143 
Weinberger v. UOP, Inc.................................................................................................... 151 

                            ii
   1   2   3   4   5   6   7