Page 86 - C:\Users\uromn\Videos\seyyedi pdf\
P. 86

Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal. 2013 Jan 1;18 (1):e146-50.                                                                                                                                                              Contraceptives and tooth movement


            previously mentioned studies which show reduction in   5. Vescovi JD, VanHeest JL, De Souza MJ. Short-term response of
            bone remodeling after oral contraceptive consumption.     bone turnover to low-dose oral contraceptives in exercising women
            Osteoclasts are primarily observed two days after force   with hypothalamic amenorrhea. Contraception. 2008;77:97-104.
                                                             6. Mirzakouchaki B, Firoozi F, Shahrbaf S. Effect of psychological
            application. We noticed a significantly lower number of   stress on orthodontic tooth movement in rats. Med Oral Patol Oral
            osteoclasts two days after appliance insertion in the ex-  Cir Bucal. 2011;16:e285-91.
            perimental group. This decrease in osteoclast number   7. Yamashiro T, Takano-Yamamoto T. Influences of ovariectomy on
            may be due to one week administration of oral contra-  experimental tooth movement in the rat. J Dent Res. 2001;80:1858-61.
                                                             8.  Bridges  T,  King  G,  Mohammed  A.  The  effect  of  age  on  tooth
            ceptive prior to appliance insertion. It has been suggest-  movement and mineral density in the alveolar tissues of the rat. Am
            ed that maximum osteoclast recruitment happens five   J OrthodDentofacialOrthop. 1988; 93:245-50.
            to seven days after force application (13). In the present   9.  King  GJ,  Keeling  SD,  Wronski  TJ.  Histomorphometric  study
            study  osteoclast  recruitment  was  significantly  lower   of  alveolar  bone  turnover  in  orthodontic  tooth  movement.  Bone.
                                                             1991;12:401-9.
            seven days after force application and also during the   10. Farish E, Hart DM, Gray CE, Beastall G, Fletcher CD, Lindsay
            linear phase after fourteen days. These findings show a   R. Effects of treatment with oestradiol/levonorgestrel on bone, lipo-
            reduced rate of bone remodeling at the movement side,   proteins and hormone status in postmenopausal women. ClinEndo-
            after administration of ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel.  crinolOxf. 1989;31:607-15.
                                                             11. Milner M, Harrison RF, Gilligan E, Kelly A. Bone density chang-
            Estrogen  inhibits  bone  remodeling  by  concurrently   es during two years treatment with tibolone or conjugated estrogens
            suppressing  osteoblastogenesis  and  osteoclastogenesis   and norgestrel, compared with untreated controls in postmenopausal
            from  marrow  precursors.  Estrogen  inhibits  bone  re-  women.Menopause. 2000;7:327-33.
            sorption via effects on the RANKL/RANK/osteopro-  12. Sultana S, Choudhury S, Choudhury SA. Serum alkaline phos-
                                                             phatase and bone mineral density: to assess bone loss in oral contra-
            tegerin system, as well as by reducing the production   ceptive pill user.Mymensingh Med J. 2002;11:107-9.
            of a number of pro-resorptive cytokines (such as IL-1,   13. Taweechaisupapong S, Srisuk N, Nimitpornsuko C, Vattraphoudes
            IL-6),  along  with  direct  effects  on  osteoclast  activity   T, Rattanayatikul C, Godfrey K. Evening primrose oil effects on os-
            and lifespan (14). Relatively little is known about the ef-  teoclast during tooth movement. Angle Orthod. 2005;75:356-61.
                                                             14. Syed F, Khosla S. Mechanisms of sex steroid effects on bone.
            fects of progestins on bone metabolism. In the ovariec-  BiochemBiophys Res Commun. 2005;328:688-96.
            tomised  rat  model,progesterone  was  reported  to  have   15. BarengoltsEI,Gajardo HF, Rosol TJ, D’Anza JJ, Pena M, Botsis J,
            similar effects to estrogenin one study (15), but antago-  et al. Effects of progesterone on post-ovariectomy bone loss in aged
            nistic actions in another (2). In a review by Thijssen,   rats. J Bone Miner Res. 1990;5:1143-7.
                                                             16. Thijssen JH. Overview on the effects of progestins on bone. Ma-
            it has been concluded that there are no indications that   turitas. 2003;46:77-87.
            the various progestins, used in clinical practice, have
            either a bone-protective or an estrogen antagonistic ac-
            tivity (16). Progestins do not add or subtract much of the
            protective action of estrogens on the bones (16). Dur-
            ing experimental tooth movement in the present study,
            ethinyl estradiol/norgestrel resulted in a significant de-
            crease in the number of osteoclasts. In our opinion this
            effect is mostly because of the estrogenic component;
            ethinyl estradiol.


            Conclusion
            In the present study it was observed that administration
            of ethynil estradiol/norgestrel in Wistar rats significant-
            ly reduced orthodontic stooth movement, 14 days after
            appliance  insertion,  and  osteoclasts  at  the  movement
            side. Therefore, female patients should be informed that
            oral contraceptives may reduce their orthodontic tooth
            movement and subsequently increase treatment period.

            References
            1. Viecilli RF, Katona TR, Chen J, Hartsfield JK Jr, Roberts WE.
            Three-dimensional  mechanical  environment  of  orthodontic  tooth
            movement,  and  root  resorption.  Am  J  OrthodDentofacialOrthop.
            2008;133:791.
            2. Compston JE. Sex Steroids and Bone. PhysiolRev. 2001;81:419-47.
            3. Herter LD, Accetta SG. Contraception and pregnancy in adoles-
            cence. J Pediatr (Rio J). 2001; 77:170-8.
            4. Fisher W, Boroditsky R, Morris B, The 2002 Canadian Contracep-
            tion Study: part 1. J ObstetGynaecol Can. 2004;26:580-90.

                                                         e150
   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91