Page 95 - C:\Users\uromn\Videos\seyyedi pdf\
P. 95

Pakfetrat et. al                                       Psychological Assessment of Patients with Oral …

               phobic anxiety,  paranoid  ideation, inter-personal   The results  of the current study  showed  that the
               sensitivity and psychoticism  with no case  in this   general  frequency of psychiatric disorders  was
               study. Due to  the  small sample size in  all   44% among the understudy population, 68.6%
               subgroups, the disorders could not be statistically   among the RAS  patients  and  22.5% among
               analyzed based on their severity.               controls. These values are way different from those
                                                               reported by Sanatkhani stating a 42.9% frequency
               Discussion                                      for psychiatric disorders in patients with RAS in
               This study aimed to psychologically assess patients   oral medicine department of Mashhad University,
               with RAS in  comparison with  controls.  Some   School of Dentistry [19]. The difference between
               previous studies have also investigated the effect   the results of  the two  studies, despite  similar
               of   psychological disorders  and stress  on   location, may be due  to the  age, gender,
               development of RAS; but the current study used a   socioeconomic differences, level of education and
               reliable questionnaire namely  SCL-90  for this   assessment time point.
               purpose  to assess different types of psychiatric   The  current study showed that  the frequency of
               disorders. Also, the current study had a control   psychiatric disorders was significantly higher in
               group and a psychologist assisted  in  analysis of   RAS patients than  in  controls (p=0.000).  This
               data, which make the current study a unique one.   finding is in accord with the results of Tang et al,
               A total of 75 subjects were evaluated out of which,   who also had a control group similar to the current
               60% were  females. In this regard,  our study is   study.  They  used   Eysencke    Personality
               similar  to those of  Gallo [12], Sanatkhani [19],   Questionnaire  (EPQ)  and SCL-90 to assess
               Ogura [21], Viraparia and Delavarian [22].      psychosocial status of subjects. The results showed
               Of studies on  the  role of psychiatric  disorders  in   that psychological  disorders may play an
               development  of RAS, some have only evaluated   underlying role in development of RAS [24].
               the level of anxiety and stress. Some used tools for   Our results confirm those of Mollashahi et al. They
               detection of psychiatric disorders while some   showed  that level  of anxiety and depression  in
               others did not. For instance, Pedersson  [4] used   RAS patients was significantly higher than that in
               Social Readjustment Rating Scale  (SRRS)  and   in negative controls (no  disease). In comparison
               Gallo  [12] used  an international  accredited   with positive control (patients with burning mouth
               questionnaire to  assess  stress.  Bujeeb [23]  used   syndrome,  unusual facial pain and myofascial
               Self-Rating Anxiety Scale (SAS) questionnaire to   pain-dysfunction syndrome) the difference in level
               assess anxiety, Viraparia  used  examination  and a   of anxiety of patients was not significant but the
               questionnaire to assess depression and Soto Araya   difference  in level of depression was significant
               [16]  used Recent  Experience  Test and Hospital   [18]. Also, our study results were in line with those
               Anxiety Depression Scale (HAD) to evaluate      of Chamani et al, who reported a significant
               stress,  anxiety  and depression.  Thus, the current   association between development of RAS and the
               study is superior to the afore-mentioned ones since   mean score of anxiety in males and females [20].
               we  used  SCL-90 to comprehensively assess   Anxiety was the most common psychiatric disorder
               different types of psychiatric disorders. Also, this   in our understudy population; which confirms the
               tool  requires not much  time or education for   results of Bujeeb [23], Tang [24] and Soto Araya
               completion and also assesses somatization.  The   [16].
               SCL-90 questionnaire has some disadvantages   Of the  evaluated disorders  including anxiety,
               including high number of  questions,  the need  for   depression,  obsessive  compulsive  disorder,
               elementary education  and  the need for  a      somatization and hostility, this study showed that
     [ Downloaded from jida.ir on 2025-02-02 ]   differences in terms  of the  questionnaires  and   occurrence of RAS. This finding is in accord with
                                                               anxiety, somatization  and depression  could be
               psychologist to interpret the results.
                                                               correlated with development of RAS but the
               Review of literature  revealed  that  similar  studies
               have been conducted  in this regard with   remaining disorders were  not correlated with the
                                                               the  results of  the study by Soto  Araya  [16] who
               tools, understudy population, sample size, etc.


                                                                                                        275
               Autumn 2014; Vol. 26, No. 4











                                                                                                                   5 / 7
   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100