Page 69 - World Airnews September 2020 Edition
P. 69

SAFETY           SAFETY


 SAFETY: FLIGHT DESCRIPTION                                                                 SAFETY: ANALYSIS



 So what actually happened here and what caused this aircraft   the left to 7 degrees left of runway heading. The indicated   Indictor (PAPI) light system on the left side, although at the   This type of accident is strongly influenced by human factors issues.






 to depart the right side of the runway on a seemingly routine   airspeed is 72 knots.   time of the accident, it would have been on the right side of the   Take-off is a high workload period for both pilots. The com-



 night take-off.  The engine thrust reduces from its maximum of 79.1% to   runway as depicted in the photograph above.  mander as pilot flying in this case would be dividing his attention




 The commander stated that he followed the yellow taxiway   idle as the commander rejects the take-off. The heading then   The runway is 2291m long (plan view) and 45m wide (addi-  between setting thrust while maintaining directional control and



 centreline onto the runway and applied power without stopping.   deviates 3 degrees to the right of runway heading again, before   tional runway information).  monitoring the airspeed increase. As this is a visual maneuver, his



 The aircraft is equipped with a Flight Data Recorder (FDR)   a large correction 15 degrees left of runway heading which   This information is available in the Jeppesen Airway Manual   primary focus is outside the cockpit. He has the windshield centre



 which registers an indicated air speed (IAS) of 34 knots about   allows the aircraft to regain the paved surface of the runway.   and other commercial charting systems will provide similar   pillar to his right, which in the case above may have obscured the




 the time the aircraft steadies up on runway heading (232   During this second correction the right engine thrust increas-  information. It is important because it allows us to develop a   approaching runway edge/grass visual cue to a certain extent.

 degrees M).   es momentarily to 81.7%. The accelerations measured by the   mental model of what we expect to see at the threshold. It may   Human factors experts have pondered whether humans are





 Eight seconds later there is a heading deviation of 2 degrees   FDR are consistent with passage over rough terrain but there is   seem like ‘a firm grasp of the non-essentials’ to pilots flying   capable of processing more than one channel of information







 to the right for about 2 seconds, followed by a correction to   no indication of an initiating event for the initial yaw.  predominantly VFR or scheduled operators who have been   at a time – are we single channel or multi-channel processors?

            flying in and out of the same airport for years. But for charter   Despite the fact that people can do things simultaneously,

            or business aircraft pilots who are continually operating to   most contemporary evidence suggests that we have a single





            unfamiliar airfields and for low visibility operations, it is vital to   cognitive processing channel and that this channel has limited
            know what you can expect to see.                   capacity. Although attention can switch rapidly from one item


 SAFETY: ANALYSIS  What about the standard markings? They are just that - stan-  to another, it can only deal with one item at a time. Clearly,




            dard, hence they are not repeated on every chart. Neverthe-  a pilot conducting a take-off needs to be operating at a high
 EXAMINATION OF THE ACCIDENT SITE  the aircraft followed the yellow taxiway centreline as described   less, standard markings form an important part of that mental   level of mental arousal. The large volume of sensory input that


 The airport operator conducts an examination of the site. The   but that it lined up on the solid white line delineating the right   model we are trying to develop as we self-brief.  needs to be processed results in a high cognitive load. This in



 results are set out with reference to the attached diagram.  edge of the runway rather than the centreline.   The runway edges would be delineated by a solid white line   turn reduces the ability of the pilot to react to or process infor-

 Under normal circumstances, it would be immediately obvi-  (runway side stripe marking). The centreline markings consist   mation that is unusual or does not align with the mental model


                                                               they have of the activity – in this case a take-off.
 ous to the crew as they would have seen the grass on the right   of uniformly spaced white stripes (30m long) and gaps (20m).
 side of the runway; however, in this case there was the large   At the threshold, there may be threshold markings or, to use   Remember also that the copilot or pilot monitoring on this


 dispersal area, to their right, which could be mistaken for the   the more descriptive term, ‘piano keys’. These also give us   flight may be predominantly ‘head-in’ at this point, reading

 right side or half of the runway.   some clue as to the width of the runway, with the 12 piano keys   checklists, monitoring that take-off thrust is set, engine indi-




 Without stopping, take-off power is applied. The aircraft ac-  at Teeside confirming that the runway is 45m wide.   cations are normal and that speed is increasing etc. A quick


 celerates rapidly. The right main gear enters the grass at point   Ahead of the ‘piano keys’ and symmetrically placed either   glance outside in the initial part of this take-off would reveal an
                                                               expanse of concrete to left and right of a solid white line with


 B and then encounters a drain cover 23 meters later near point   side of the centreline, are the white runway designation mark-  white lights. That looks normal doesn’t it? He now diverts his
 C, which is at the edge of the disused runway.   ings or ‘runway numbers’.   attention back inside to continue monitoring. A few seconds






 This causes the small 2 degree yaw to the right and may   Putting all of that information together, what should the crew   later he looks up, sees grass to the right, a rabbit running

 account for the ‘bump’ felt by the crew. The aircraft is doing   see as they line up prior to take-off? The yellow taxiway centreline   towards the aircraft and then a bump, followed by a strong yaw


 about 72 knots as is crosses the disused runway. The right main   crosses the solid white runway edge line and piano keys to the   to the right, 30 to 40 degrees as far as he could recall in the in-
 gear as well as the nose gear now enter the grass once again   centreline. On or just ahead of the piano keys, we should see the   cident report. And this is all happening in a matter of seconds.

 beyond the disused runway. The nose yaws 7 degrees left mo-  white runway numbers ‘23’ directly ahead, symmetrical about the   Quite often, pilots will erroneously alter than recollection



 mentarily as a correction is made and the nosewheel enters the   centreline. The stripes of the centreline are directly ahead, as are   of an event to fit in with their mental model of it. In fact, the




 paved surface. The Citation then deviates 3 degrees right once   the associated centreline lights. (In fact, during IMC and particu-  aircraft had yawed only 2 or 3 degrees to the right. Could the



 again and the nose wheel departs the right edge of the runway   larly during low visibility operations, we often count them to get a





 a second time. In addition to full left rudder and differential   crosscheck of the reported runway visual range.) The commander   angle at which their take-off trajectory (about 232 degrees)

                                                               crossed the old disused runway (orientated about 190 degrees)
 braking, the commander increases the thrust on the right en-  stated in his report that he did not see any centreline lights at all.  have altered his perception of the yaw angle? I have seen


 gine and the aircraft yaws 15 degrees to the left. Its path then   Solid white edge lines may be visible at night in the landing   simulator debriefs where pilots were not aware that a large red


 takes it back onto the runway.  lights to left and right, although possibly not on such a wide


 Note the yellow centreline of Taxiway Alpha which leads to   runway. Nevertheless, the white runway edge lights should be   fire light accompanied by the associated warning had activated

 the threshold of runway 23. Notional point A is where the take-  DEVELOPING A MENTAL MODEL  plainly visible on each   (and been silenced!)

 off was assumed to start when the aircraft aligned with runway   If we were to operate in or out of Teeside Airport on a charter,   side of the Citation.   during a take-off –



 heading, but it was probably to the right of point A. A tyre mark   what information would be available to us? A quick review of the   The red component   they had to be shown

 is seen on the grassed area right of the runway between points   current Jeppesen 10-9 page (included below) reveals the following:  of the PAPI lights   the debrief video of

 B and C. Point B is 140m into the take-off run (right main gear).   •  The airport plan view depicts taxiway A leading to holding   should be visible to   the event.
 There is a further tyre mark at point D which continues across   point A1 at the threshold of runway 23. This is also desig-  the left or the right   The bottom line is


 the disused runway and into the grass again at point E. At point   nated as a hotspot.   of the runway as   that we humans are
 E, a second tyre mark is seen entering the grass, but closer to   •  The dispersal area is shown to the right (or northwest)   indicated on the Jepp   not efficient proces-
 the runway (nose gear).   of the threshold in grey, so we know it is not part of the   10-9 chart in visibility   sors of information
 Both tyre marks now deviate to the left as the PAPA light   runway which is depicted in black.   greater than 300m   under conditions of

 structure is approached and the tyre nearer the runway returns   •  The chart shows an RVR transmissometer to the north-  RVR. PAPI lights are   high workload. As a
 to the paved surface. The main tyre track parallels the runway   west of the dispersal area.   not something that   result, we need to
 before deviating to the right again and the second tyre track   are usually associat-       ensure that as much

 appears once more. Both tracks then gradually turn to the left   •  The disused runway crossing runway 23 near the thresh-  ed with take-off, the   as possible is in


 old end is depicted as a line of grey Xs’.
 and return to the paved surface at point F.   point being that if you                       order with errors/dis-
                                                                                             crepancies resolved



 An extensive search for the reported hare/rabbit or its re-  In the additional runway information section in the middle   line up on what you   before proceeding


 mains yields no result.  block of the 10-9 chart there is a note stating that aircraft requir-  think is the runway
 ing more than runway width to turn should do so at the runway   centreline and find         to a high workload

 MECHANICAL INSPECTION  ends where extra width (the dispersal areas) is available.  them directly ahead of   phase of flight such as

 The aircraft is examined but no fault is found which could   In terms of lighting, the runway is equipped with white high   you, it could be taken   take-off or approach

                                                                                             and landing.

 account for the yaw described by the crew.  intensity runway lights (HIRL) spaced 60m apart, demarcating   as a subtle cue that all
 the edge of the runway. White centreline Lights (CL) spaced   is not well.                    Pilots are typically
 MOST LIKELY SCENARIO  30m apart demarcate the centreline.                                   reluctant to stop, slow
 The available flight data and ground witness marks suggest that   Today, the 10-9 chart shows a Precision Approach Path   HUMAN FACTORS  down or hesitate on

 World Airnews | September 2019                   World Airnews | September 2019
 — 66 —                                                    — 67 —
   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74