Page 40 - World Airnews Magazine May 2020 Edition
P. 40

TECHNICAL


       reversals can exceed structural design limits.        structures. A prime example of this occurred when a Boeing 747


         Also, certification flight tests involve control input in a single axis   nearing Anchorage, Alaska, on March 31, 1993, was in the vicinity



       and single direction. Control reversals will amplify the loads on the   of strong mountain wave turbulence.


       aircraft’s structures.                                 The jumbo experienced a rapid 50-deg. roll to the left followed


         The Airbus document “Managing Severe Turbulence” provides   by a significant yaw. Then came several pitch and roll oscillations.



       additional guidance to flight crews of fly-by-wire (FBW) aircraft   The severe turbulence created dynamic multi-axis loadings that so


       based upon in-depth analysis of severe turbulence events. Airbus   exceeded the structural capability of the No. 2 engine pylon that it
       engineers discovered that pilots who followed the prescribed   separated from the airplane, taking the engine with it.


       recommendations for FBW aircraft to keep the autopilot and auto   WHAT IS “MULTI-AXIAL” LOADING AND WHY IS IT

       throttles engaged were able to minimize the loads on aircraft, as   IMPORTANT TO THIS DISCUSSION?

       opposed to flight crews who took over manually.

         The manufacturer’s Flight Crew Operating Manual recommenda-  Its impact on an engine pylon illustrates this phenomenon perfect-




       tions are to follow the target speed (which depends on altitude) when   ly. Under normal circumstances in flight, the engine is producing


       turbulence is encountered and keep auto throttles engaged except if   a significant amount of forward thrust, thus its pylon endures a
       thrust changes become excessive and keep the autopilot on.   direct tensile (pulling) force along its primary axis and is designed
                                                             accordingly. Now, consider an abrupt rolling input to the aircraft.

         Detailed studies found the autopilot, when combined with the   Suddenly, in addition to the tensile force from the thrust-produc-


       turbulence-induced motions, limits the aircraft to smaller reac-  tion, the pylon experiences a sideways shearing force. This places


       tions. In contrast, they also found that pilot pitch-down reaction   the pylon into a condition of “multi-axial” force . . . tensile stress






       to an initial updraft will accentuate the pitch-down effect as the   in one direction and shear stress in another. The combination of






       aircraft flies into the downdraft section.            stresses acts in a direction that the structural element was not


         This increases the negative load factor and increases the risk and   designed to withstand originally, and can lead to failure.

       number of injuries.
         A severe turbulence encounter may lead to excessive high-speed   SUMMARY

       or low-speed excursions. This will induce autopilot disconnections   Due to the risk of reduced structural integrity of an airplane, the



       and activation of the appropriate flight control law in an FBW air-  NTSB is concerned about deficiencies in inspection procedures.



       craft. In the case of a Vmo/Mmo exceedance, a pitch-up would be   Implicit in the high-load and inspection formulation was the


       commanded to reduce the excursion.                    presumption that the specified inspections would be adequate to




         If excessive low speed occurs, the alpha protection law would   identify and address damage caused by any such event.

       activate and produce a nose-down movement. In order to keep   Canadair and Airbus determined their published inspection cri-




       the autopilot engaged as long as possible, flight control software   teria were inadequate to ensure safety after the high-load events



       modifications have been developed on FBW aircraft.    encountered by their airplanes, and that additional broader and




         Severe turbulence can induce significant altitude excursions be-  more-detailed inspections were required to ensure safety.

       cause of the turbulence or as a consequence of triggering the Vmo/  The NTSB wants to prevent inspected but still unairworthy


       Mmo protection or the AOA protection. Without the pilot in the   aircraft from returning to service after events that exceeded the





       loop these protections will place a priority on protecting the target   manufacturer’s threshold. Furthermore, the board is troubled that
       speed rather than maintaining the trajectory. When either protec-  aircraft may be exceeding design and certification standards more






       tion law is activated, the autopilot is disconnected automatically.   frequently than was known or expected, and recommends all such


       The pilot should apply smooth corrections to manage the aircraft   events be tracked and evaluated.




       trajectory and avoid sudden corrections fighting the turbulence.  After encountering significant turbulence or any other event that


         According to the industry’s Upset Recovery Manual, if during re-  may have exceeded the aircraft’s structural limitations, a captain



       covery the application of full lateral control (ailerons and spoilers)   is responsible for annotating the fact in the aircraft’s logbook after



       is insufficient, it may be necessary to apply rudder in the direction   the flight, triggering a mandatory inspection for structural damage.





       of the desired roll. The manual warns, “only a small amount of   According to Airbus, turbulence can be considered as excessive
       rudder input is needed. Too much rudder applied too quickly or   when passengers and crew are moved violently against their seat belts
       held too long may result in loss of lateral and directional control   and objects move around the aircraft. Inspections that are mandated



       and cause structural damage.”                         after flight in excessive turbulence are described in the AMM.



         After recovering the aircraft, flight crews must assess any dam-  In case of severe turbulence, it is recommended the manufactur-


       age that may have occurred.                           er be informed as well. Note that in some cases the manufacturers

         Severe atmospheric turbulence and inappropriate flight-crew   have determined that limit loads have been exceeded in portions




       control inputs can induce significant “multi-axial” loads on aircraft   of the aircraft, thus requiring additional inspections. Q



                                                            w
                                                             s | Ma
                                                    W
                                                   World Airnews | May 2020y 2020
                                                     orld Airne
                                                          — 38 —
                                                         — 38 —
   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45